Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
SPG vs STAG
Simon Property Group, Inc. versus Stag Industrial Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
SPG wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but STAG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | SPG | STAG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 4.64% | 4.05% | SPG wins |
| Dividend safety | 6.8/10 | 5.2/10 | SPG wins |
| Growth trend | -0.47% vs 5y | +0.01% vs 5y | SPG wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 1.40 | 0.98 | STAG wins |
| Scale | $61.1B | $7.5B | SPG wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 4 wins | 1 wins | SPG wins |
Dimension by dimension
SPG wins on yield (4.64% vs 4.05%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $59 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
SPG's higher yield (4.64%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus STAG's 4.05% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
SPG wins on safety (6.8/10 vs 5.2/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. SPG scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
SPG (6.8/10) scores 1.6 points higher than STAG (5.2/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
SPG shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
SPG's yield is 0.47% below its 5y average, versus 0.01% for STAG. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
STAG is less volatile (beta 0.98 vs 1.40)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
SPG is 8.1× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, SPG or STAG?
SPG wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but STAG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
SPG vs STAG: which has a higher dividend yield?
SPG yields 4.64% and STAG yields 4.05%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $59 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is SPG or STAG a safer dividend in 2026?
SPG scores 6.8/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. STAG scores 5.2/10 (Mixed). SPG is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, SPG or STAG?
SPG's yield is 0.47% below its 5y average, versus 0.01% for STAG. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
SPG vs STAG: which is more tax-efficient?
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
Get emailed when SPG vs STAG data updates.
Already own SPG or STAG? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding SPG to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →