Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
O vs STAG
Realty Income Corporation versus Stag Industrial Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
O wins 3–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but STAG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | O | STAG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 4.96% | 3.98% | O wins |
| Dividend safety | 5.8/10 | 5.7/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | -0.10% vs 5y | -0.06% vs 5y | Tie |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.73 | 0.98 | O wins |
| Scale | $60.1B | $7.6B | O wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 3 wins | 0 wins | O wins |
Dimension by dimension
O wins on yield (4.96% vs 3.98%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $98 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
O's higher yield (4.96%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus STAG's 3.98% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
Safety scores are too close to call (5.8/10 vs 5.7/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
Yield trends are similar
Both tickers' current yields sit close to their 5-year averages, suggesting comparable dividend-vs-price trajectories.
O is less volatile (beta 0.73 vs 0.98)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
O is 7.9× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, O or STAG?
O wins 3–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but STAG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
O vs STAG: which has a higher dividend yield?
O yields 4.96% and STAG yields 3.98%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $98 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is O or STAG a safer dividend in 2026?
O scores 5.8/10 (Mixed) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. STAG scores 5.7/10 (Mixed). O is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, O or STAG?
Both tickers' current yields sit close to their 5-year averages, suggesting comparable dividend-vs-price trajectories.
O vs STAG: which is more tax-efficient?
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
Get emailed when O vs STAG data updates.
Already own O or STAG? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding O to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →