Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
ADC vs O
Agree Realty Corporation versus Realty Income Corp. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
O wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but ADC can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
O wins this comparison 3–2 across 6 dimensions. O yields 5.42% — higher than ADC's 4.38% — and carries a 5.8/10 dividend safety score (Mixed) vs 5.2/10 for ADC (Mixed). O wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but ADC can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
On yield alone, O generates 5.42% vs 4.38% — a 1.04% difference that translates to $1,040 more per year on a $100,000 investment. On dividend safety, O scores 5.8/10 (Mixed) vs 5.2/10 (Mixed) for ADC — investors prioritizing income reliability should weight that gap alongside the yield difference.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | ADC | O | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 4.38% | 5.42% | O wins |
| Dividend safety | 5.2/10 | 5.8/10 | O wins |
| Growth trend | +0.17% vs 5y | +0.32% vs 5y | ADC wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.47 | 0.71 | ADC wins |
| Scale | $9.1B | $56.4B | O wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 3 wins | O wins |
Dimension by dimension
O wins on yield (5.42% vs 4.38%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $104 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
O's higher yield (5.42%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus ADC's 4.38% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
O wins on safety (5.8/10 vs 5.2/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. O scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
O (5.8/10) scores 0.6 points higher than ADC (5.2/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
ADC shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
ADC's yield is 0.17% above its 5y average, versus 0.32% for O. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ADC is less volatile (beta 0.47 vs 0.71)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
O is 6.2× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, ADC or O?
O wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but ADC can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
ADC vs O: which has a higher dividend yield?
ADC yields 4.38% and O yields 5.42%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $104 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is ADC or O a safer dividend in 2026?
ADC scores 5.2/10 (Mixed) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. O scores 5.8/10 (Mixed). O is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, ADC or O?
ADC's yield is 0.17% above its 5y average, versus 0.32% for O. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ADC vs O: which is more tax-efficient?
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
Get emailed when ADC vs O data updates.
Already own ADC or O? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding O to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →