Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
MMM vs NOC
3M Company versus Northrop Grumman Corporation — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
MMM wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NOC can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
MMM or NOC — which is better?
MMM wins this comparison 2–1 across 6 dimensions. MMM yields 1.81% — higher than NOC's 1.71% — and carries a 8.8/10 dividend safety score (Strong) vs 8.8/10 for NOC (Strong). MMM wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NOC can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
On yield alone, MMM generates 1.81% vs 1.71% — a 0.10% difference that translates to $100 more per year on a $100,000 investment.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | MMM | NOC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 1.81% | 1.71% | MMM wins |
| Dividend safety | 8.8/10 | 8.8/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | -1.22% vs 5y | +0.17% vs 5y | MMM wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 1.06 | -0.11 | NOC wins |
| Scale | $88.5B | $76.8B | Tie |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 1 wins | MMM wins |
Dimension by dimension
MMM wins on yield (1.81% vs 1.71%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $10 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
MMM's higher yield (1.81%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus NOC's 1.71% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
Safety scores are too close to call (8.8/10 vs 8.8/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
MMM shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
MMM's yield is 1.22% below its 5y average, versus 0.17% for NOC. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
NOC is less volatile (beta -0.11 vs 1.06)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
Comparable scale ($88.5B vs $76.8B)
Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Full breakdown per ticker: are MMM dividends qualified and are NOC dividends qualified — each with the after-tax income at every federal bracket.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice. Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
MMM or NOC — which is better?
MMM is better on our scoring, winning 2–1 across six dimensions: yield, dividend safety, growth, cost, scale, and tax treatment. MMM wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NOC can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Which is better for income, MMM or NOC?
MMM wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NOC can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
MMM vs NOC: which has a higher dividend yield?
MMM yields 1.81% and NOC yields 1.71%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $10 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is MMM or NOC a safer dividend in 2026?
MMM scores 8.8/10 (Strong) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. NOC scores 8.8/10 (Strong). Both have comparable safety scores.
Which has better dividend growth, MMM or NOC?
MMM's yield is 1.22% below its 5y average, versus 0.17% for NOC. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
MMM vs NOC: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when MMM vs NOC data updates.
Compare both against your actual holdings
Put MMM and NOC into the free analyzer with the rest of your portfolio. You'll see what each one contributes to your annual income, your weighted safety score, and whether adding MMM diversifies you or just duplicates what you hold. No account, no download.