← All comparisons

Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

IVV vs VTI

BlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. - iShares Core S&P 500 ETF versus Vanguard Group, Inc. - Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

VTI wins 1–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but IVV can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Scorecard at a glance

DimensionIVVVTIWinner
Yield1.09%1.05%Tie
Dividend safety7.4/107.4/10Tie
Growth trendTie
Expense ratio3.00%3.00%Tie
Scale$888.1B$2.3TVTI wins
Tax efficiencyQualified-eligibleQualified-eligibleTie
Overall0 wins1 winsVTI wins

Dimension by dimension

IVV and VTI have nearly identical yields (1.09% vs 1.05%)

Yields are within 5 basis points — effectively a coin-flip on income.

IVV: 1.09%VTI: 1.05%

Safety scores are too close to call (7.4/10 vs 7.4/10)

Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.

IVV: 7.4/10VTI: 7.4/10

Yield-trend comparison unavailable

One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.

IVV: VTI:

Expense ratios are effectively identical

Both ETFs charge 3.00% — no meaningful cost difference over decades of compounding.

IVV: 3.00%VTI: 3.00%

VTI is 2.6× larger by AUM

Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

IVV: $888.1BVTI: $2.3T

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

IVV: Qualified-eligibleVTI: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, IVV or VTI?

VTI wins 1–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but IVV can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

IVV vs VTI: which has a higher dividend yield?

IVV yields 1.09% and VTI yields 1.05%. Yields are within 5 basis points — effectively a coin-flip on income.

Is IVV or VTI a safer dividend in 2026?

IVV scores 7.4/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. VTI scores 7.4/10 (Solid). Both have comparable safety scores.

Which has better dividend growth, IVV or VTI?

One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.

IVV vs VTI: which is more tax-efficient?

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

Already own IVV or VTI? See if the other adds anything.

Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding VTI to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).

Check overlap with my portfolio →