Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
IVV vs VOO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF versus SS S&P 500 INDEX X — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
IVV and VOO are evenly matched (1–1 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | IVV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 1.09% | 1.07% | Tie |
| Dividend safety | 7.4/10 | 6.5/10 | IVV wins |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Volatility (beta) | 1.00 | 1.00 | Tie |
| Scale | $888.1B | $1.7T | VOO wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 1 wins | 1 wins | Tie |
Dimension by dimension
IVV and VOO have nearly identical yields (1.09% vs 1.07%)
Yields are within 5 basis points — effectively a coin-flip on income.
IVV wins on safety (7.4/10 vs 6.5/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. IVV scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
IVV (7.4/10) scores 0.9 points higher than VOO (6.5/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
Volatility (beta) is similar
Both tickers move with comparable sensitivity to the broader market.
VOO is 1.9× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, IVV or VOO?
IVV and VOO are evenly matched (1–1 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
IVV vs VOO: which has a higher dividend yield?
IVV yields 1.09% and VOO yields 1.07%. Yields are within 5 basis points — effectively a coin-flip on income.
Is IVV or VOO a safer dividend in 2026?
IVV scores 7.4/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. VOO scores 6.5/10 (Solid). IVV is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, IVV or VOO?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
IVV vs VOO: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when IVV vs VOO data updates.
Already own IVV or VOO? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding either to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →