Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
IVV vs SPY
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF versus SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
IVV wins 2–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but SPY can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | IVV | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 1.09% | 1.01% | IVV wins |
| Dividend safety | 7.4/10 | 7.4/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 3.00% | 9.45% | IVV wins |
| Scale | $888.1B | $781.2B | Tie |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 0 wins | IVV wins |
Dimension by dimension
IVV wins on yield (1.09% vs 1.01%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $8 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Safety scores are too close to call (7.4/10 vs 7.4/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
IVV is cheaper (3.00% vs 9.45%)
On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $645/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.
On $10,000 invested, IVV's lower expense ratio saves roughly $6/year in fees versus SPY. Over 20 years that compounds to a meaningful drag — expense ratios are one of the few costs investors fully control.
Comparable scale ($888.1B vs $781.2B)
Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, IVV or SPY?
IVV wins 2–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but SPY can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
IVV vs SPY: which has a higher dividend yield?
IVV yields 1.09% and SPY yields 1.01%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $8 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is IVV or SPY a safer dividend in 2026?
IVV scores 7.4/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. SPY scores 7.4/10 (Solid). Both have comparable safety scores.
Which has better dividend growth, IVV or SPY?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
IVV vs SPY: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when IVV vs SPY data updates.
Already own IVV or SPY? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding IVV to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →