Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
DIVO vs QYLD
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF versus Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
DIVO wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but QYLD can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
DIVO or QYLD — which is better?
DIVO wins this comparison 2–1 across 6 dimensions. DIVO yields 2.33% — lower than QYLD's 9.88% — and carries a 7.3/10 dividend safety score (Solid) vs 5.1/10 for QYLD (Mixed). DIVO wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but QYLD can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
On yield alone, QYLD generates 9.88% vs 2.33% — a 7.55% difference that translates to $7,550 more per year on a $100,000 investment. On dividend safety, DIVO scores 7.3/10 (Solid) vs 5.1/10 (Mixed) for QYLD — investors prioritizing income reliability should weight that gap alongside the yield difference.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | DIVO | QYLD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 2.33% | 9.88% | QYLD wins |
| Dividend safety | 7.3/10 | 5.1/10 | DIVO wins |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 56.00% | 60.00% | DIVO wins |
| Scale | $7.7B | $8.1B | Tie |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 1 wins | DIVO wins |
Dimension by dimension
QYLD wins on yield (9.88% vs 2.33%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $755 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
QYLD's higher yield (9.88%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus DIVO's 2.33% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
DIVO wins on safety (7.3/10 vs 5.1/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. DIVO scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
DIVO (7.3/10) scores 2.2 points higher than QYLD (5.1/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
DIVO is cheaper (56.00% vs 60.00%)
On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $400/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.
Comparable scale ($7.7B vs $8.1B)
Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
QYLD uses a covered-call or options strategy that typically generates ordinary income taxed at your full marginal rate. DIVO's dividends may qualify for the 0–20% qualified dividend rate. In a taxable account, DIVO keeps more of your income after taxes.
Full breakdown per ticker: are DIVO dividends qualified and are QYLD dividends qualified — each with the after-tax income at every federal bracket.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice. Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
DIVO or QYLD — which is better?
DIVO is better on our scoring, winning 2–1 across six dimensions: yield, dividend safety, growth, cost, scale, and tax treatment. DIVO wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but QYLD can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Which is better for income, DIVO or QYLD?
DIVO wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but QYLD can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
DIVO vs QYLD: which has a higher dividend yield?
DIVO yields 2.33% and QYLD yields 9.88%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $755 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is DIVO or QYLD a safer dividend in 2026?
DIVO scores 7.3/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. QYLD scores 5.1/10 (Mixed). DIVO is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, DIVO or QYLD?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
DIVO vs QYLD: which is more tax-efficient?
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
Get emailed when DIVO vs QYLD data updates.
Compare both against your actual holdings
Put DIVO and QYLD into the free analyzer with the rest of your portfolio. You'll see what each one contributes to your annual income, your weighted safety score, and whether adding DIVO diversifies you or just duplicates what you hold. No account, no download.