Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
JEPI vs QYLD
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income Fund versus Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
JEPI wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but QYLD can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | JEPI | QYLD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 8.11% | 5.77% | JEPI wins |
| Dividend safety | 5.4/10 | 6.8/10 | QYLD wins |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 35.00% | 60.00% | JEPI wins |
| Scale | $44.7B | $8.4B | JEPI wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 3 wins | 1 wins | JEPI wins |
Dimension by dimension
JEPI wins on yield (8.11% vs 5.77%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $234 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
JEPI's higher yield (8.11%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus QYLD's 5.77% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
QYLD wins on safety (6.8/10 vs 5.4/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. QYLD scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
QYLD (6.8/10) scores 1.4 points higher than JEPI (5.4/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
JEPI is cheaper (35.00% vs 60.00%)
On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $2500/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.
On $10,000 invested, JEPI's lower expense ratio saves roughly $25/year in fees versus QYLD. Over 20 years that compounds to a meaningful drag — expense ratios are one of the few costs investors fully control.
JEPI is 5.3× larger by AUM
Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, JEPI or QYLD?
JEPI wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but QYLD can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
JEPI vs QYLD: which has a higher dividend yield?
JEPI yields 8.11% and QYLD yields 5.77%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $234 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is JEPI or QYLD a safer dividend in 2026?
JEPI scores 5.4/10 (Mixed) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. QYLD scores 6.8/10 (Solid). QYLD is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, JEPI or QYLD?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
JEPI vs QYLD: which is more tax-efficient?
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
Get emailed when JEPI vs QYLD data updates.
Already own JEPI or QYLD? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding JEPI to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →