← All comparisons

Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

APD vs LYB

Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. versus LyondellBasell Industries N.V. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

APD wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but LYB can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Scorecard at a glance

DimensionAPDLYBWinner
Yield2.48%6.58%LYB wins
Dividend safety6.7/104.5/10APD wins
Growth trend+0.08% vs 5y+0.33% vs 5yAPD wins
Volatility (beta)0.860.33LYB wins
Scale$64.9B$20.0BAPD wins
Tax efficiencyQualified-eligibleQualified-eligibleTie
Overall3 wins2 winsAPD wins

Dimension by dimension

LYB wins on yield (6.58% vs 2.48%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $410 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

APD: 2.48%LYB: 6.58%

APD wins on safety (6.7/10 vs 4.5/10)

Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. APD scores better on the weighted average of those factors.

APD: 6.7/10LYB: 4.5/10

APD shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

APD's yield is 0.08% above its 5y average, versus 0.33% for LYB. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

APD: +0.08% vs 5yLYB: +0.33% vs 5y

LYB is less volatile (beta 0.33 vs 0.86)

Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.

APD: 0.86LYB: 0.33

APD is 3.3× larger by market cap

Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

APD: $64.9BLYB: $20.0B

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

APD: Qualified-eligibleLYB: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better, APD or LYB?

APD wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but LYB can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Does APD or LYB have a higher yield?

On a $10,000 investment that's about $410 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is APD or LYB a safer dividend?

APD scores 6.7/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. LYB scores 4.5/10 (Weak). See the safety dimension above for what drove each score.

Should I own both APD and LYB?

It depends on overlap. Two ETFs in similar categories often hold many of the same companies — owning both can mean paying two expense ratios for similar exposure. Check the underlying holdings before stacking.

Already own APD or LYB? See if the other adds anything.

Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding APD to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).

Check overlap with my portfolio →