Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
STAG vs WPC
Stag Industrial Inc. versus W. P. Carey Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
WPC wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but STAG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | STAG | WPC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 4.03% | 5.14% | WPC wins |
| Dividend safety | 5.2/10 | 5.5/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | +0.00% vs 5y | -0.67% vs 5y | WPC wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.98 | 0.79 | WPC wins |
| Scale | $7.3B | $15.9B | WPC wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 0 wins | 4 wins | WPC wins |
Dimension by dimension
WPC wins on yield (5.14% vs 4.03%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $111 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Safety scores are too close to call (5.2/10 vs 5.5/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
WPC shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
WPC's yield is 0.67% below its 5y average, versus 0.00% for STAG. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
WPC is less volatile (beta 0.79 vs 0.98)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
WPC is 2.2× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better, STAG or WPC?
WPC wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but STAG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Does STAG or WPC have a higher yield?
On a $10,000 investment that's about $111 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is STAG or WPC a safer dividend?
STAG scores 5.2/10 (Mixed) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. WPC scores 5.5/10 (Mixed). See the safety dimension above for what drove each score.
Should I own both STAG and WPC?
It depends on overlap. Two ETFs in similar categories often hold many of the same companies — owning both can mean paying two expense ratios for similar exposure. Check the underlying holdings before stacking.
Already own STAG or WPC? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding WPC to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →