Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

STAG vs WPC

STAG Industrial, Inc. versus W. P. Carey Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

WPC wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but STAG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

WPC wins this comparison 4–0 across 6 dimensions. WPC yields 5.14% — higher than STAG's 4.11% — and carries a 5.5/10 dividend safety score (Mixed) vs 5.2/10 for STAG (Mixed). WPC wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but STAG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

On yield alone, WPC generates 5.14% vs 4.11% — a 1.03% difference that translates to $1,030 more per year on a $100,000 investment.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	STAG	WPC	Winner
Yield	4.11%	5.14%	WPC wins
Dividend safety	5.2/10	5.5/10	Tie
Growth trend	+0.07% vs 5y	-0.67% vs 5y	WPC wins
Volatility (beta)	0.96	0.79	WPC wins
Scale	$7.4B	$15.9B	WPC wins
Tax efficiency	Ordinary income	Ordinary income	Tie
Overall	0 wins	4 wins	WPC wins

Dimension by dimension

WPC wins on yield (5.14% vs 4.11%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $103 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

WPC's higher yield (5.14%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus STAG's 4.11% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

STAG: 4.11%WPC: 5.14%

Safety scores are too close to call (5.2/10 vs 5.5/10)

Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.

STAG: 5.2/10WPC: 5.5/10

WPC shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

WPC's yield is 0.67% below its 5y average, versus 0.07% for STAG. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

STAG: +0.07% vs 5yWPC: -0.67% vs 5y

WPC is less volatile (beta 0.79 vs 0.96)

Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.

STAG: 0.96WPC: 0.79

WPC is 2.1× larger by market cap

Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

STAG: $7.4BWPC: $15.9B

Both have similar tax-treatment concerns

Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.

STAG: Ordinary incomeWPC: Ordinary income

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, STAG or WPC?

WPC wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but STAG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

STAG vs WPC: which has a higher dividend yield?

STAG yields 4.11% and WPC yields 5.14%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $103 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is STAG or WPC a safer dividend in 2026?

STAG scores 5.2/10 (Mixed) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. WPC scores 5.5/10 (Mixed). WPC is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, STAG or WPC?