← All comparisons

Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

QYLD vs YMAG

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF versus YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

QYLD wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but YMAG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

QYLD wins this comparison 3–1 across 6 dimensions. QYLD yields 9.88% — lower than YMAG's 39.37% — and carries a 5.1/10 dividend safety score (Mixed) vs 4.7/10 for YMAG (Weak). QYLD wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but YMAG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

On yield alone, YMAG generates 39.37% vs 9.88% — a 29.49% difference that translates to $29,490 more per year on a $100,000 investment.

Scorecard at a glance

DimensionQYLDYMAGWinner
Yield9.88%39.37%YMAG wins
Dividend safety5.1/104.7/10QYLD wins
Growth trendTie
Expense ratio60.00%134.00%QYLD wins
Scale$8.1B$286MQYLD wins
Tax efficiencyOrdinary incomeOrdinary incomeTie
Overall3 wins1 winsQYLD wins

Dimension by dimension

YMAG wins on yield (39.37% vs 9.88%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $2949 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

YMAG's higher yield (39.37%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus QYLD's 9.88% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

QYLD: 9.88%YMAG: 39.37%

QYLD wins on safety (5.1/10 vs 4.7/10)

Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. QYLD scores better on the weighted average of those factors.

QYLD: 5.1/10YMAG: 4.7/10

Yield-trend comparison unavailable

One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.

QYLD: YMAG:

QYLD is cheaper (60.00% vs 134.00%)

On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $7400/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.

On $10,000 invested, QYLD's lower expense ratio saves roughly $74/year in fees versus YMAG. Over 20 years that compounds to a meaningful drag — expense ratios are one of the few costs investors fully control.

QYLD: 60.00%YMAG: 134.00%

QYLD is 28.3× larger by AUM

Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

QYLD: $8.1BYMAG: $286M

Both have similar tax-treatment concerns

Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.

QYLD uses a covered-call or options strategy that typically generates ordinary income taxed at your full marginal rate. YMAG's dividends may qualify for the 0–20% qualified dividend rate. In a taxable account, YMAG keeps more of your income after taxes.

QYLD: Ordinary incomeYMAG: Ordinary income

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, QYLD or YMAG?

QYLD wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but YMAG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

QYLD vs YMAG: which has a higher dividend yield?

QYLD yields 9.88% and YMAG yields 39.37%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $2949 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is QYLD or YMAG a safer dividend in 2026?

QYLD scores 5.1/10 (Mixed) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. YMAG scores 4.7/10 (Weak). QYLD is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, QYLD or YMAG?

One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.

QYLD vs YMAG: which is more tax-efficient?

Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.

Already own QYLD or YMAG? See if the other adds anything.

Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding QYLD to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).

Check overlap with my portfolio →