Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
YMAG vs YMAX
YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs versus YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
YMAG and YMAX are evenly matched (1–1 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | YMAG | YMAX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 52.60% | 47.96% | YMAG wins |
| Dividend safety | 4.7/10 | 4.7/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 134.00% | 133.00% | YMAX wins |
| Scale | $316M | $450M | Tie |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 1 wins | 1 wins | Tie |
Dimension by dimension
YMAG wins on yield (52.60% vs 47.96%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $464 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
YMAG's higher yield (52.60%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus YMAX's 47.96% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
Safety scores are too close to call (4.7/10 vs 4.7/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
YMAX is cheaper (133.00% vs 134.00%)
On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $100/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.
Comparable scale ($316M vs $450M)
Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, YMAG or YMAX?
YMAG and YMAX are evenly matched (1–1 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
YMAG vs YMAX: which has a higher dividend yield?
YMAG yields 52.60% and YMAX yields 47.96%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $464 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is YMAG or YMAX a safer dividend in 2026?
YMAG scores 4.7/10 (Weak) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. YMAX scores 4.7/10 (Weak). Both have comparable safety scores.
Which has better dividend growth, YMAG or YMAX?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
YMAG vs YMAX: which is more tax-efficient?
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
Get emailed when YMAG vs YMAX data updates.
Already own YMAG or YMAX? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding either to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →