Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
NVDA vs TXN
NVIDIA Corporation versus Texas Instruments Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
TXN wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NVDA can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
NVDA or TXN — which is better?
TXN wins this comparison 4–1 across 6 dimensions. TXN yields 2.04% — higher than NVDA's 0.46% — and carries a 7.4/10 dividend safety score (Solid) vs 7.1/10 for NVDA (Solid). TXN wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NVDA can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
On yield alone, TXN generates 2.04% vs 0.46% — a 1.58% difference that translates to $1,580 more per year on a $100,000 investment.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | NVDA | TXN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 0.46% | 2.04% | TXN wins |
| Dividend safety | 7.1/10 | 7.4/10 | TXN wins |
| Growth trend | +0.43% vs 5y | -0.61% vs 5y | TXN wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 2.22 | 1.34 | TXN wins |
| Scale | $5.3T | $282.4B | NVDA wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 1 wins | 4 wins | TXN wins |
Dimension by dimension
TXN wins on yield (2.04% vs 0.46%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $158 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
TXN's higher yield (2.04%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus NVDA's 0.46% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
TXN wins on safety (7.4/10 vs 7.1/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. TXN scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
TXN shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
TXN's yield is 0.61% below its 5y average, versus 0.43% for NVDA. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
TXN is less volatile (beta 1.34 vs 2.22)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
NVDA is 18.6× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Full breakdown per ticker: are NVDA dividends qualified and are TXN dividends qualified — each with the after-tax income at every federal bracket.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice. Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
NVDA or TXN — which is better?
TXN is better on our scoring, winning 4–1 across six dimensions: yield, dividend safety, growth, cost, scale, and tax treatment. TXN wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NVDA can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Which is better for income, NVDA or TXN?
TXN wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NVDA can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
NVDA vs TXN: which has a higher dividend yield?
NVDA yields 0.46% and TXN yields 2.04%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $158 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is NVDA or TXN a safer dividend in 2026?
NVDA scores 7.1/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. TXN scores 7.4/10 (Solid). TXN is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, NVDA or TXN?
TXN's yield is 0.61% below its 5y average, versus 0.43% for NVDA. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
NVDA vs TXN: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when NVDA vs TXN data updates.
Compare both against your actual holdings
Put NVDA and TXN into the free analyzer with the rest of your portfolio. You'll see what each one contributes to your annual income, your weighted safety score, and whether adding TXN diversifies you or just duplicates what you hold. No account, no download.