Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

NVDA vs TXN

NVIDIA Corporation versus Texas Instruments Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

TXN wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NVDA can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

TXN wins this comparison 4–1 across 6 dimensions. TXN yields 2.17% — higher than NVDA's 0.45% — and carries a 7.4/10 dividend safety score (Solid) vs 7.1/10 for NVDA (Solid). TXN wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NVDA can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

On yield alone, TXN generates 2.17% vs 0.45% — a 1.72% difference that translates to $1,720 more per year on a $100,000 investment.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	NVDA	TXN	Winner
Yield	0.45%	2.17%	TXN wins
Dividend safety	7.1/10	7.4/10	TXN wins
Growth trend	+0.40% vs 5y	-0.54% vs 5y	TXN wins
Volatility (beta)	2.22	1.31	TXN wins
Scale	$5.3T	$236.4B	NVDA wins
Tax efficiency	Qualified-eligible	Qualified-eligible	Tie
Overall	1 wins	4 wins	TXN wins

Dimension by dimension

TXN wins on yield (2.17% vs 0.45%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $172 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

TXN's higher yield (2.17%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus NVDA's 0.45% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

NVDA: 0.45%TXN: 2.17%

TXN wins on safety (7.4/10 vs 7.1/10)

Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. TXN scores better on the weighted average of those factors.

NVDA: 7.1/10TXN: 7.4/10

TXN shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

TXN's yield is 0.54% below its 5y average, versus 0.40% for NVDA. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

NVDA: +0.40% vs 5yTXN: -0.54% vs 5y

TXN is less volatile (beta 1.31 vs 2.22)

Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.

NVDA: 2.22TXN: 1.31

NVDA is 22.3× larger by market cap

Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

NVDA: $5.3TTXN: $236.4B

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

NVDA: Qualified-eligibleTXN: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, NVDA or TXN?

TXN wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NVDA can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

NVDA vs TXN: which has a higher dividend yield?

NVDA yields 0.45% and TXN yields 2.17%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $172 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is NVDA or TXN a safer dividend in 2026?

NVDA scores 7.1/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. TXN scores 7.4/10 (Solid). TXN is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, NVDA or TXN?