Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
AVGO vs TXN
Broadcom Inc. versus Texas Instruments Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
TXN wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but AVGO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
AVGO or TXN — which is better?
TXN wins this comparison 3–2 across 6 dimensions. TXN yields 1.97% — higher than AVGO's 0.76% — and carries a 8.0/10 dividend safety score (Strong) vs 8.8/10 for AVGO (Strong). TXN wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but AVGO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
On yield alone, TXN generates 1.97% vs 0.76% — a 1.21% difference that translates to $1,210 more per year on a $100,000 investment. On dividend safety, AVGO scores 8.8/10 (Strong) vs 8.0/10 (Strong) for TXN — investors prioritizing income reliability should weight that gap alongside the yield difference.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | AVGO | TXN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 0.76% | 1.97% | TXN wins |
| Dividend safety | 8.8/10 | 8.0/10 | AVGO wins |
| Growth trend | -0.48% vs 5y | -0.68% vs 5y | TXN wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 1.48 | 1.34 | TXN wins |
| Scale | $1.7T | $283.3B | AVGO wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 3 wins | TXN wins |
Dimension by dimension
TXN wins on yield (1.97% vs 0.76%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $121 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
TXN's higher yield (1.97%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus AVGO's 0.76% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
AVGO wins on safety (8.8/10 vs 8.0/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. AVGO scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
AVGO (8.8/10) scores 0.8 points higher than TXN (8.0/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
TXN shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
TXN's yield is 0.68% below its 5y average, versus 0.48% for AVGO. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
TXN is less volatile (beta 1.34 vs 1.48)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
AVGO is 5.9× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Full breakdown per ticker: are AVGO dividends qualified and are TXN dividends qualified — each with the after-tax income at every federal bracket.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice. Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
AVGO or TXN — which is better?
TXN is better on our scoring, winning 3–2 across six dimensions: yield, dividend safety, growth, cost, scale, and tax treatment. TXN wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but AVGO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Which is better for income, AVGO or TXN?
TXN wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but AVGO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
AVGO vs TXN: which has a higher dividend yield?
AVGO yields 0.76% and TXN yields 1.97%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $121 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is AVGO or TXN a safer dividend in 2026?
AVGO scores 8.8/10 (Strong) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. TXN scores 8.0/10 (Strong). AVGO is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, AVGO or TXN?
TXN's yield is 0.68% below its 5y average, versus 0.48% for AVGO. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
AVGO vs TXN: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when AVGO vs TXN data updates.
Compare both against your actual holdings
Put AVGO and TXN into the free analyzer with the rest of your portfolio. You'll see what each one contributes to your annual income, your weighted safety score, and whether adding TXN diversifies you or just duplicates what you hold. No account, no download.