Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

AVGO vs TXN

Broadcom Inc. versus Texas Instruments Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

AVGO wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but TXN can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	AVGO	TXN	Winner
Yield	0.67%	2.03%	TXN wins
Dividend safety	8.3/10	7.4/10	AVGO wins
Growth trend	-1.20% vs 5y	-0.68% vs 5y	AVGO wins
Volatility (beta)	1.46	1.31	TXN wins
Scale	$1.9T	$255.3B	AVGO wins
Tax efficiency	Qualified-eligible	Qualified-eligible	Tie
Overall	3 wins	2 wins	AVGO wins

Dimension by dimension

TXN wins on yield (2.03% vs 0.67%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $136 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

TXN's higher yield (2.03%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus AVGO's 0.67% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

AVGO: 0.67%TXN: 2.03%

AVGO wins on safety (8.3/10 vs 7.4/10)

Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. AVGO scores better on the weighted average of those factors.

AVGO (8.3/10) scores 0.9 points higher than TXN (7.4/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.

AVGO: 8.3/10TXN: 7.4/10

AVGO shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

AVGO's yield is 1.20% below its 5y average, versus 0.68% for TXN. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

AVGO: -1.20% vs 5yTXN: -0.68% vs 5y

TXN is less volatile (beta 1.31 vs 1.46)

Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.

AVGO: 1.46TXN: 1.31

AVGO is 7.3× larger by market cap

Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

AVGO: $1.9TTXN: $255.3B

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

AVGO: Qualified-eligibleTXN: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, AVGO or TXN?

AVGO wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but TXN can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

AVGO vs TXN: which has a higher dividend yield?

AVGO yields 0.67% and TXN yields 2.03%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $136 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is AVGO or TXN a safer dividend in 2026?

AVGO scores 8.3/10 (Strong) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. TXN scores 7.4/10 (Solid). AVGO is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, AVGO or TXN?