Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
AVGO vs CSCO
Broadcom Inc. versus Cisco Systems, Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
CSCO wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but AVGO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
CSCO wins this comparison 3–2 across 6 dimensions. CSCO yields 1.45% — higher than AVGO's 0.71% — and carries a 8.3/10 dividend safety score (Strong) vs 8.8/10 for AVGO (Strong). CSCO wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but AVGO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
On yield alone, CSCO generates 1.45% vs 0.71% — a 0.74% difference that translates to $740 more per year on a $100,000 investment. On dividend safety, AVGO scores 8.8/10 (Strong) vs 8.3/10 (Strong) for CSCO — investors prioritizing income reliability should weight that gap alongside the yield difference.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | AVGO | CSCO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 0.71% | 1.45% | CSCO wins |
| Dividend safety | 8.8/10 | 8.3/10 | AVGO wins |
| Growth trend | -1.05% vs 5y | -1.34% vs 5y | CSCO wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 1.46 | 1.01 | CSCO wins |
| Scale | $1.7T | $457.2B | AVGO wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 3 wins | CSCO wins |
Dimension by dimension
CSCO wins on yield (1.45% vs 0.71%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $74 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
CSCO's higher yield (1.45%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus AVGO's 0.71% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
AVGO wins on safety (8.8/10 vs 8.3/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. AVGO scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
AVGO (8.8/10) scores 0.5 points higher than CSCO (8.3/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
CSCO shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
CSCO's yield is 1.34% below its 5y average, versus 1.05% for AVGO. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
CSCO is less volatile (beta 1.01 vs 1.46)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
AVGO is 3.8× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, AVGO or CSCO?
CSCO wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but AVGO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
AVGO vs CSCO: which has a higher dividend yield?
AVGO yields 0.71% and CSCO yields 1.45%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $74 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is AVGO or CSCO a safer dividend in 2026?
AVGO scores 8.8/10 (Strong) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. CSCO scores 8.3/10 (Strong). AVGO is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, AVGO or CSCO?
CSCO's yield is 1.34% below its 5y average, versus 1.05% for AVGO. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
AVGO vs CSCO: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when AVGO vs CSCO data updates.
Already own AVGO or CSCO? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding CSCO to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →