Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
AVGO vs CSCO
Broadcom Inc. versus Cisco Systems, Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
CSCO wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but AVGO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | AVGO | CSCO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 0.70% | 1.47% | CSCO wins |
| Dividend safety | 8.3/10 | 8.3/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | -1.17% vs 5y | -1.32% vs 5y | Tie |
| Volatility (beta) | 1.46 | 1.01 | CSCO wins |
| Scale | $1.8T | $450.0B | AVGO wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 1 wins | 2 wins | CSCO wins |
Dimension by dimension
CSCO wins on yield (1.47% vs 0.70%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $77 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
CSCO's higher yield (1.47%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus AVGO's 0.70% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
Safety scores are too close to call (8.3/10 vs 8.3/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
Yield trends are similar
Both tickers' current yields sit close to their 5-year averages, suggesting comparable dividend-vs-price trajectories.
CSCO is less volatile (beta 1.01 vs 1.46)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
AVGO is 4.1× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, AVGO or CSCO?
CSCO wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but AVGO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
AVGO vs CSCO: which has a higher dividend yield?
AVGO yields 0.70% and CSCO yields 1.47%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $77 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is AVGO or CSCO a safer dividend in 2026?
AVGO scores 8.3/10 (Strong) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. CSCO scores 8.3/10 (Strong). Both have comparable safety scores.
Which has better dividend growth, AVGO or CSCO?
Both tickers' current yields sit close to their 5-year averages, suggesting comparable dividend-vs-price trajectories.
AVGO vs CSCO: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when AVGO vs CSCO data updates.
Already own AVGO or CSCO? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding CSCO to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →