Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
QCOM vs TXN
QUALCOMM Incorporated versus Texas Instruments Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
QCOM and TXN are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | QCOM | TXN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 2.20% | 2.03% | QCOM wins |
| Dividend safety | 8.8/10 | 7.4/10 | QCOM wins |
| Growth trend | +0.08% vs 5y | -0.68% vs 5y | TXN wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 1.64 | 1.31 | TXN wins |
| Scale | $176.0B | $255.3B | Tie |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 2 wins | Tie |
Dimension by dimension
QCOM wins on yield (2.20% vs 2.03%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $17 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
QCOM's higher yield (2.20%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus TXN's 2.03% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
QCOM wins on safety (8.8/10 vs 7.4/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. QCOM scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
QCOM (8.8/10) scores 1.4 points higher than TXN (7.4/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
TXN shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
TXN's yield is 0.68% below its 5y average, versus 0.08% for QCOM. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
TXN is less volatile (beta 1.31 vs 1.64)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
Comparable scale ($176.0B vs $255.3B)
Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, QCOM or TXN?
QCOM and TXN are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
QCOM vs TXN: which has a higher dividend yield?
QCOM yields 2.20% and TXN yields 2.03%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $17 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is QCOM or TXN a safer dividend in 2026?
QCOM scores 8.8/10 (Strong) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. TXN scores 7.4/10 (Solid). QCOM is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, QCOM or TXN?
TXN's yield is 0.68% below its 5y average, versus 0.08% for QCOM. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
QCOM vs TXN: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when QCOM vs TXN data updates.
Already own QCOM or TXN? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding either to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →