Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

QCOM vs TXN

QUALCOMM Incorporated versus Texas Instruments Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

TXN wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but QCOM can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

TXN wins this comparison 3–2 across 6 dimensions. TXN yields 2.17% — lower than QCOM's 2.49% — and carries a 7.4/10 dividend safety score (Solid) vs 7.8/10 for QCOM (Solid). TXN wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but QCOM can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

On yield alone, QCOM generates 2.49% vs 2.17% — a 0.32% difference that translates to $320 more per year on a $100,000 investment.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	QCOM	TXN	Winner
Yield	2.49%	2.17%	QCOM wins
Dividend safety	7.8/10	7.4/10	QCOM wins
Growth trend	+0.37% vs 5y	-0.54% vs 5y	TXN wins
Volatility (beta)	1.64	1.31	TXN wins
Scale	$155.0B	$236.4B	TXN wins
Tax efficiency	Qualified-eligible	Qualified-eligible	Tie
Overall	2 wins	3 wins	TXN wins

Dimension by dimension

QCOM wins on yield (2.49% vs 2.17%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $32 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

QCOM's higher yield (2.49%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus TXN's 2.17% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

QCOM: 2.49%TXN: 2.17%

QCOM wins on safety (7.8/10 vs 7.4/10)

Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. QCOM scores better on the weighted average of those factors.

QCOM: 7.8/10TXN: 7.4/10

TXN shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

TXN's yield is 0.54% below its 5y average, versus 0.37% for QCOM. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

QCOM: +0.37% vs 5yTXN: -0.54% vs 5y

TXN is less volatile (beta 1.31 vs 1.64)

Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.

QCOM: 1.64TXN: 1.31

TXN is 1.5× larger by market cap

Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

QCOM: $155.0BTXN: $236.4B

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

QCOM: Qualified-eligibleTXN: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, QCOM or TXN?

TXN wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but QCOM can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

QCOM vs TXN: which has a higher dividend yield?

QCOM yields 2.49% and TXN yields 2.17%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $32 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is QCOM or TXN a safer dividend in 2026?

QCOM scores 7.8/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. TXN scores 7.4/10 (Solid). QCOM is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, QCOM or TXN?