Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
NOBL vs SCHD
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF versus Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
SCHD wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but NOBL can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | NOBL | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 1.94% | 3.30% | SCHD wins |
| Dividend safety | 7.6/10 | 7.9/10 | SCHD wins |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 35.00% | 6.00% | SCHD wins |
| Scale | $12.0B | $95.7B | SCHD wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 0 wins | 4 wins | SCHD wins |
Dimension by dimension
SCHD wins on yield (3.30% vs 1.94%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $136 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
SCHD's higher yield (3.30%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus NOBL's 1.94% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
SCHD wins on safety (7.9/10 vs 7.6/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. SCHD scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
SCHD is cheaper (6.00% vs 35.00%)
On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $2900/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.
On $10,000 invested, SCHD's lower expense ratio saves roughly $29/year in fees versus NOBL. Over 20 years that compounds to a meaningful drag — expense ratios are one of the few costs investors fully control.
SCHD is 8.0× larger by AUM
Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, NOBL or SCHD?
SCHD wins 4–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but NOBL can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
NOBL vs SCHD: which has a higher dividend yield?
NOBL yields 1.94% and SCHD yields 3.30%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $136 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is NOBL or SCHD a safer dividend in 2026?
NOBL scores 7.6/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. SCHD scores 7.9/10 (Solid). SCHD is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, NOBL or SCHD?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
NOBL vs SCHD: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when NOBL vs SCHD data updates.
Already own NOBL or SCHD? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding SCHD to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →