Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
DGRO vs NOBL
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF versus ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
DGRO wins 2–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but NOBL can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | DGRO | NOBL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 1.95% | 1.94% | Tie |
| Dividend safety | 7.6/10 | 7.6/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 8.00% | 35.00% | DGRO wins |
| Scale | $41.2B | $12.0B | DGRO wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 0 wins | DGRO wins |
Dimension by dimension
DGRO and NOBL have nearly identical yields (1.95% vs 1.94%)
Yields are within 5 basis points — effectively a coin-flip on income.
Safety scores are too close to call (7.6/10 vs 7.6/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
DGRO is cheaper (8.00% vs 35.00%)
On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $2700/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.
On $10,000 invested, DGRO's lower expense ratio saves roughly $27/year in fees versus NOBL. Over 20 years that compounds to a meaningful drag — expense ratios are one of the few costs investors fully control.
DGRO is 3.4× larger by AUM
Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, DGRO or NOBL?
DGRO wins 2–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but NOBL can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
DGRO vs NOBL: which has a higher dividend yield?
DGRO yields 1.95% and NOBL yields 1.94%. Yields are within 5 basis points — effectively a coin-flip on income.
Is DGRO or NOBL a safer dividend in 2026?
DGRO scores 7.6/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. NOBL scores 7.6/10 (Solid). Both have comparable safety scores.
Which has better dividend growth, DGRO or NOBL?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
DGRO vs NOBL: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when DGRO vs NOBL data updates.
Already own DGRO or NOBL? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding DGRO to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →