Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

LMT vs RTX

Lockheed Martin Corporation versus RTX Corporation — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

LMT and RTX are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.

Neither LMT nor RTX wins outright — the two are nearly equivalent across all 6 dimensions, making the choice largely a matter of which account you hold them in and personal preference on yield vs stability. LMT and RTX are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.

On yield alone, LMT generates 2.45% vs 1.39% — a 1.06% difference that translates to $1,060 more per year on a $100,000 investment.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	LMT	RTX	Winner
Yield	2.45%	1.39%	LMT wins
Dividend safety	8.3/10	8.3/10	Tie
Growth trend	-0.18% vs 5y	-0.71% vs 5y	RTX wins
Volatility (beta)	0.11	0.29	LMT wins
Scale	$130.1B	$282.9B	RTX wins
Tax efficiency	Qualified-eligible	Qualified-eligible	Tie
Overall	2 wins	2 wins	Tie

Dimension by dimension

LMT wins on yield (2.45% vs 1.39%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $106 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

LMT's higher yield (2.45%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus RTX's 1.39% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

LMT: 2.45%RTX: 1.39%

Safety scores are too close to call (8.3/10 vs 8.3/10)

Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.

LMT: 8.3/10RTX: 8.3/10

RTX shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

RTX's yield is 0.71% below its 5y average, versus 0.18% for LMT. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

LMT: -0.18% vs 5yRTX: -0.71% vs 5y

LMT is less volatile (beta 0.11 vs 0.29)

Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.

LMT: 0.11RTX: 0.29

RTX is 2.2× larger by market cap

Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

LMT: $130.1BRTX: $282.9B

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

LMT: Qualified-eligibleRTX: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, LMT or RTX?

LMT and RTX are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.

LMT vs RTX: which has a higher dividend yield?

LMT yields 2.45% and RTX yields 1.39%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $106 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is LMT or RTX a safer dividend in 2026?

LMT scores 8.3/10 (Strong) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. RTX scores 8.3/10 (Strong). Both have comparable safety scores.

Which has better dividend growth, LMT or RTX?