Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
BA vs LMT
The Boeing Company versus Lockheed Martin Corporation — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
LMT wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but BA can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
LMT wins this comparison 3–1 across 6 dimensions. LMT yields 2.45% — higher than BA's 0.00% — and carries a 8.3/10 dividend safety score (Strong) vs 4.8/10 for BA (Weak). LMT wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but BA can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
On dividend safety, LMT scores 8.3/10 (Strong) vs 4.8/10 (Weak) for BA — LMT has a stronger composite of payout coverage, yield zone, and dividend trend signals.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | BA | LMT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 0.00% | 2.45% | LMT wins |
| Dividend safety | 4.8/10 | 8.3/10 | LMT wins |
| Growth trend | -2.48% vs 5y | -0.18% vs 5y | BA wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 1.21 | 0.11 | LMT wins |
| Scale | $181.3B | $130.1B | Tie |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 1 wins | 3 wins | LMT wins |
Dimension by dimension
LMT wins on yield (2.45% vs 0.00%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $245 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
LMT's higher yield (2.45%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus BA's 0.00% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
LMT wins on safety (8.3/10 vs 4.8/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. LMT scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
LMT (8.3/10) scores 3.5 points higher than BA (4.8/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
BA shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
BA's yield is 2.48% below its 5y average, versus 0.18% for LMT. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
LMT is less volatile (beta 0.11 vs 1.21)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
Comparable scale ($181.3B vs $130.1B)
Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, BA or LMT?
LMT wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but BA can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
BA vs LMT: which has a higher dividend yield?
BA yields 0.00% and LMT yields 2.45%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $245 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is BA or LMT a safer dividend in 2026?
BA scores 4.8/10 (Weak) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. LMT scores 8.3/10 (Strong). LMT is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, BA or LMT?
BA's yield is 2.48% below its 5y average, versus 0.18% for LMT. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
BA vs LMT: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when BA vs LMT data updates.
Already own BA or LMT? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding LMT to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →