Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
KO vs WMT
The Coca-Cola Company versus Walmart Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
KO wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but WMT can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
KO or WMT — which is better?
KO wins this comparison 3–2 across 6 dimensions. KO yields 2.29% — higher than WMT's 0.82% — and carries a 8.0/10 dividend safety score (Strong) vs 8.8/10 for WMT (Strong). KO wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but WMT can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
On yield alone, KO generates 2.29% vs 0.82% — a 1.47% difference that translates to $1,470 more per year on a $100,000 investment. On dividend safety, WMT scores 8.8/10 (Strong) vs 8.0/10 (Strong) for KO — investors prioritizing income reliability should weight that gap alongside the yield difference.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | KO | WMT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 2.29% | 0.82% | KO wins |
| Dividend safety | 8.0/10 | 8.8/10 | WMT wins |
| Growth trend | -0.54% vs 5y | -0.31% vs 5y | KO wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.32 | 0.58 | KO wins |
| Scale | $392.3B | $946.7B | WMT wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 3 wins | 2 wins | KO wins |
Dimension by dimension
KO wins on yield (2.29% vs 0.82%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $147 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
KO's higher yield (2.29%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus WMT's 0.82% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
WMT wins on safety (8.8/10 vs 8.0/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. WMT scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
WMT (8.8/10) scores 0.8 points higher than KO (8.0/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
KO shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
KO's yield is 0.54% below its 5y average, versus 0.31% for WMT. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
KO is less volatile (beta 0.32 vs 0.58)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
WMT is 2.4× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Full breakdown per ticker: are KO dividends qualified and are WMT dividends qualified — each with the after-tax income at every federal bracket.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice. Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
KO or WMT — which is better?
KO is better on our scoring, winning 3–2 across six dimensions: yield, dividend safety, growth, cost, scale, and tax treatment. KO wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but WMT can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Which is better for income, KO or WMT?
KO wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but WMT can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
KO vs WMT: which has a higher dividend yield?
KO yields 2.29% and WMT yields 0.82%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $147 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is KO or WMT a safer dividend in 2026?
KO scores 8.0/10 (Strong) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. WMT scores 8.8/10 (Strong). WMT is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, KO or WMT?
KO's yield is 0.54% below its 5y average, versus 0.31% for WMT. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
KO vs WMT: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when KO vs WMT data updates.
Compare both against your actual holdings
Put KO and WMT into the free analyzer with the rest of your portfolio. You'll see what each one contributes to your annual income, your weighted safety score, and whether adding KO diversifies you or just duplicates what you hold. No account, no download.