Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
DGRW vs IVV
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund versus iShares Core S&P 500 ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
IVV wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but DGRW can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | DGRW | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 1.34% | 1.06% | DGRW wins |
| Dividend safety | 6.9/10 | 7.4/10 | IVV wins |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 28.00% | 3.00% | IVV wins |
| Scale | $16.2B | $854.9B | IVV wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 1 wins | 3 wins | IVV wins |
Dimension by dimension
DGRW wins on yield (1.34% vs 1.06%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $28 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
IVV wins on safety (7.4/10 vs 6.9/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. IVV scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
IVV is cheaper (3.00% vs 28.00%)
On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $2500/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.
IVV is 52.6× larger by AUM
Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better, DGRW or IVV?
IVV wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but DGRW can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Does DGRW or IVV have a higher yield?
On a $10,000 investment that's about $28 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is DGRW or IVV a safer dividend?
DGRW scores 6.9/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. IVV scores 7.4/10 (Solid). See the safety dimension above for what drove each score.
Should I own both DGRW and IVV?
It depends on overlap. Two ETFs in similar categories often hold many of the same companies — owning both can mean paying two expense ratios for similar exposure. Check the underlying holdings before stacking.
Already own DGRW or IVV? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding IVV to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →