Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
DGRW vs IVV
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund versus iShares Core S&P 500 ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
IVV wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but DGRW can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
IVV wins this comparison 3–1 across 6 dimensions. IVV yields 1.06% — lower than DGRW's 1.34% — and carries a 7.4/10 dividend safety score (Solid) vs 6.9/10 for DGRW (Solid). IVV wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but DGRW can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
On yield alone, DGRW generates 1.34% vs 1.06% — a 0.28% difference that translates to $280 more per year on a $100,000 investment. On dividend safety, IVV scores 7.4/10 (Solid) vs 6.9/10 (Solid) for DGRW — investors prioritizing income reliability should weight that gap alongside the yield difference.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | DGRW | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 1.34% | 1.06% | DGRW wins |
| Dividend safety | 6.9/10 | 7.4/10 | IVV wins |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 28.00% | 3.00% | IVV wins |
| Scale | $16.2B | $884.0B | IVV wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 1 wins | 3 wins | IVV wins |
Dimension by dimension
DGRW wins on yield (1.34% vs 1.06%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $28 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
DGRW's higher yield (1.34%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus IVV's 1.06% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
IVV wins on safety (7.4/10 vs 6.9/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. IVV scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
IVV (7.4/10) scores 0.5 points higher than DGRW (6.9/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
IVV is cheaper (3.00% vs 28.00%)
On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $2500/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.
On $10,000 invested, IVV's lower expense ratio saves roughly $25/year in fees versus DGRW. Over 20 years that compounds to a meaningful drag — expense ratios are one of the few costs investors fully control.
IVV is 54.4× larger by AUM
Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, DGRW or IVV?
IVV wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but DGRW can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
DGRW vs IVV: which has a higher dividend yield?
DGRW yields 1.34% and IVV yields 1.06%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $28 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is DGRW or IVV a safer dividend in 2026?
DGRW scores 6.9/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. IVV scores 7.4/10 (Solid). IVV is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, DGRW or IVV?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
DGRW vs IVV: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when DGRW vs IVV data updates.
Already own DGRW or IVV? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding IVV to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →