← All comparisons

Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

SCHY vs VEA

Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF versus Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

VEA wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but SCHY can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

SCHY or VEA — which is better?

VEA wins this comparison 3–1 across 6 dimensions. VEA yields 2.41% — lower than SCHY's 3.33% — and carries a 8.1/10 dividend safety score (Strong) vs 7.3/10 for SCHY (Solid). VEA wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but SCHY can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

On yield alone, SCHY generates 3.33% vs 2.41% — a 0.92% difference that translates to $920 more per year on a $100,000 investment. On dividend safety, VEA scores 8.1/10 (Strong) vs 7.3/10 (Solid) for SCHY — investors prioritizing income reliability should weight that gap alongside the yield difference.

Scorecard at a glance

DimensionSCHYVEAWinner
Yield3.33%2.41%SCHY wins
Dividend safety7.3/108.1/10VEA wins
Growth trend——Tie
Expense ratio8.00%3.00%VEA wins
Scale$2.5B$313.5BVEA wins
Tax efficiencyQualified-eligibleQualified-eligibleTie
Overall1 wins3 winsVEA wins

Dimension by dimension

SCHY wins on yield (3.33% vs 2.41%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $92 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

SCHY's higher yield (3.33%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus VEA's 2.41% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

SCHY: 3.33%VEA: 2.41%

VEA wins on safety (8.1/10 vs 7.3/10)

Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. VEA scores better on the weighted average of those factors.

VEA (8.1/10) scores 0.8 points higher than SCHY (7.3/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.

SCHY: 7.3/10VEA: 8.1/10

Yield-trend comparison unavailable

One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.

SCHY: —VEA: —

VEA is cheaper (3.00% vs 8.00%)

On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $500/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.

On $10,000 invested, VEA's lower expense ratio saves roughly $5/year in fees versus SCHY. Over 20 years that compounds to a meaningful drag — expense ratios are one of the few costs investors fully control.

SCHY: 8.00%VEA: 3.00%

VEA is 124.3× larger by AUM

Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

SCHY: $2.5BVEA: $313.5B

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

Full breakdown per ticker: are SCHY dividends qualified and are VEA dividends qualified — each with the after-tax income at every federal bracket.

SCHY: Qualified-eligibleVEA: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice. Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

SCHY or VEA — which is better?

VEA is better on our scoring, winning 3–1 across six dimensions: yield, dividend safety, growth, cost, scale, and tax treatment. VEA wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but SCHY can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Which is better for income, SCHY or VEA?

VEA wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but SCHY can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

SCHY vs VEA: which has a higher dividend yield?

SCHY yields 3.33% and VEA yields 2.41%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $92 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is SCHY or VEA a safer dividend in 2026?

SCHY scores 7.3/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. VEA scores 8.1/10 (Strong). VEA is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, SCHY or VEA?

One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.

SCHY vs VEA: which is more tax-efficient?

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

Compare both against your actual holdings

Put SCHY and VEA into the free analyzer with the rest of your portfolio. You'll see what each one contributes to your annual income, your weighted safety score, and whether adding VEA diversifies you or just duplicates what you hold. No account, no download.