Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
QQQ vs VTI
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 versus VANGUARD TOTAL STOCK MKT ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
VTI wins 3–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but QQQ can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | QQQ | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 0.41% | 1.05% | VTI wins |
| Dividend safety | 7.4/10 | 7.4/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 18.00% | 3.00% | VTI wins |
| Scale | $490.1B | $2.3T | VTI wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 0 wins | 3 wins | VTI wins |
Dimension by dimension
VTI wins on yield (1.05% vs 0.41%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $64 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
VTI's higher yield (1.05%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus QQQ's 0.41% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
Safety scores are too close to call (7.4/10 vs 7.4/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
VTI is cheaper (3.00% vs 18.00%)
On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $1500/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.
On $10,000 invested, VTI's lower expense ratio saves roughly $15/year in fees versus QQQ. Over 20 years that compounds to a meaningful drag — expense ratios are one of the few costs investors fully control.
VTI is 4.7× larger by AUM
Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, QQQ or VTI?
VTI wins 3–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but QQQ can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
QQQ vs VTI: which has a higher dividend yield?
QQQ yields 0.41% and VTI yields 1.05%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $64 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is QQQ or VTI a safer dividend in 2026?
QQQ scores 7.4/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. VTI scores 7.4/10 (Solid). Both have comparable safety scores.
Which has better dividend growth, QQQ or VTI?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
QQQ vs VTI: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when QQQ vs VTI data updates.
Already own QQQ or VTI? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding VTI to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →