← All comparisons

Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

PG vs TGT

The Procter & Gamble Company versus Target Corp. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

PG and TGT are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.

PG or TGT — which is better?

Neither PG nor TGT wins outright — the two are nearly equivalent across all 6 dimensions, making the choice largely a matter of which account you hold them in and personal preference on yield vs stability. PG and TGT are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.

On dividend safety, TGT scores 8.3/10 (Strong) vs 7.5/10 (Solid) for PG — TGT has a stronger composite of payout coverage, yield zone, and dividend trend signals. On yield, TGT's 3.13% vs 2.73% represents a $400 annual income gap on $100,000 invested.

Scorecard at a glance

DimensionPGTGTWinner
Yield2.73%3.13%TGT wins
Dividend safety7.5/108.3/10TGT wins
Growth trend+0.23% vs 5y+0.35% vs 5yTie
Volatility (beta)0.380.98PG wins
Scale$366.8B$67.7BPG wins
Tax efficiencyQualified-eligibleQualified-eligibleTie
Overall2 wins2 winsTie

Dimension by dimension

TGT wins on yield (3.13% vs 2.73%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $40 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

TGT's higher yield (3.13%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus PG's 2.73% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

PG: 2.73%TGT: 3.13%

TGT wins on safety (8.3/10 vs 7.5/10)

Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. TGT scores better on the weighted average of those factors.

TGT (8.3/10) scores 0.8 points higher than PG (7.5/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.

PG: 7.5/10TGT: 8.3/10

Yield trends are similar

Both tickers' current yields sit close to their 5-year averages, suggesting comparable dividend-vs-price trajectories.

PG: +0.23% vs 5yTGT: +0.35% vs 5y

PG is less volatile (beta 0.38 vs 0.98)

Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.

PG: 0.38TGT: 0.98

PG is 5.4× larger by market cap

Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

PG: $366.8BTGT: $67.7B

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

Full breakdown per ticker: are PG dividends qualified and are TGT dividends qualified — each with the after-tax income at every federal bracket.

PG: Qualified-eligibleTGT: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice. Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

PG or TGT — which is better?

Neither — PG and TGT tie 2–2 across the six dimensions we score. PG and TGT are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.

Which is better for income, PG or TGT?

PG and TGT are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.

PG vs TGT: which has a higher dividend yield?

PG yields 2.73% and TGT yields 3.13%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $40 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is PG or TGT a safer dividend in 2026?

PG scores 7.5/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. TGT scores 8.3/10 (Strong). TGT is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, PG or TGT?

Both tickers' current yields sit close to their 5-year averages, suggesting comparable dividend-vs-price trajectories.

PG vs TGT: which is more tax-efficient?

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

Compare both against your actual holdings

Put PG and TGT into the free analyzer with the rest of your portfolio. You'll see what each one contributes to your annual income, your weighted safety score, and whether adding either diversifies you or just duplicates what you hold. No account, no download.