Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

PG vs TGT

The Procter & Gamble Company versus Target Corporation — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

TGT wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but PG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	PG	TGT	Winner
Yield	2.98%	3.18%	TGT wins
Dividend safety	7.0/10	8.3/10	TGT wins
Growth trend	+0.50% vs 5y	+0.20% vs 5y	TGT wins
Volatility (beta)	—	—	Tie
Scale	$335.2B	$65.6B	PG wins
Tax efficiency	Qualified-eligible	Qualified-eligible	Tie
Overall	1 wins	3 wins	TGT wins

Dimension by dimension

TGT wins on yield (3.18% vs 2.98%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $20 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

TGT's higher yield (3.18%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus PG's 2.98% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

PG: 2.98%TGT: 3.18%

TGT wins on safety (8.3/10 vs 7.0/10)

Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. TGT scores better on the weighted average of those factors.

TGT (8.3/10) scores 1.3 points higher than PG (7.0/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.

PG: 7.0/10TGT: 8.3/10

TGT shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

TGT's yield is 0.20% above its 5y average, versus 0.50% for PG. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

PG: +0.50% vs 5yTGT: +0.20% vs 5y

Volatility comparison unavailable

Beta data missing for one or both tickers.

PG: —TGT: —

PG is 5.1× larger by market cap

Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

PG: $335.2BTGT: $65.6B

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

PG: Qualified-eligibleTGT: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, PG or TGT?

TGT wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but PG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

PG vs TGT: which has a higher dividend yield?

PG yields 2.98% and TGT yields 3.18%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $20 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is PG or TGT a safer dividend in 2026?

PG scores 7.0/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. TGT scores 8.3/10 (Strong). TGT is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, PG or TGT?