Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

NNN vs STAG

NNN REIT, Inc. versus Stag Industrial Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

NNN and STAG are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	NNN	STAG	Winner
Yield	5.49%	3.98%	NNN wins
Dividend safety	5.2/10	5.7/10	STAG wins
Growth trend	+0.31% vs 5y	-0.06% vs 5y	STAG wins
Volatility (beta)	0.80	0.98	NNN wins
Scale	$8.3B	$7.6B	Tie
Tax efficiency	Ordinary income	Ordinary income	Tie
Overall	2 wins	2 wins	Tie

Dimension by dimension

NNN wins on yield (5.49% vs 3.98%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $151 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

NNN's higher yield (5.49%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus STAG's 3.98% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

NNN: 5.49%STAG: 3.98%

STAG wins on safety (5.7/10 vs 5.2/10)

Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. STAG scores better on the weighted average of those factors.

STAG (5.7/10) scores 0.5 points higher than NNN (5.2/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.

NNN: 5.2/10STAG: 5.7/10

STAG shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

STAG's yield is 0.06% below its 5y average, versus 0.31% for NNN. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

NNN: +0.31% vs 5ySTAG: -0.06% vs 5y

NNN is less volatile (beta 0.80 vs 0.98)

Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.

NNN: 0.80STAG: 0.98

Comparable scale ($8.3B vs $7.6B)

Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.

NNN: $8.3BSTAG: $7.6B

Both have similar tax-treatment concerns

Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.

NNN: Ordinary incomeSTAG: Ordinary income

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, NNN or STAG?

NNN and STAG are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.

NNN vs STAG: which has a higher dividend yield?

NNN yields 5.49% and STAG yields 3.98%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $151 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is NNN or STAG a safer dividend in 2026?

NNN scores 5.2/10 (Mixed) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. STAG scores 5.7/10 (Mixed). STAG is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, NNN or STAG?