Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

MSTY vs YMAG

YieldMax MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF versus YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

MSTY wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but YMAG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

MSTY wins this comparison 2–1 across 6 dimensions. MSTY yields 36.21% — lower than YMAG's 39.37% — and carries a 4.7/10 dividend safety score (Weak) vs 4.7/10 for YMAG (Weak). MSTY wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but YMAG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

On yield alone, YMAG generates 39.37% vs 36.21% — a 3.16% difference that translates to $3,160 more per year on a $100,000 investment.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	MSTY	YMAG	Winner
Yield	36.21%	39.37%	YMAG wins
Dividend safety	4.7/10	4.7/10	Tie
Growth trend	—	—	Tie
Expense ratio	103.00%	134.00%	MSTY wins
Scale	$757M	$286M	MSTY wins
Tax efficiency	Ordinary income	Ordinary income	Tie
Overall	2 wins	1 wins	MSTY wins

Dimension by dimension

YMAG wins on yield (39.37% vs 36.21%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $316 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

YMAG's higher yield (39.37%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus MSTY's 36.21% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

MSTY: 36.21%YMAG: 39.37%

Safety scores are too close to call (4.7/10 vs 4.7/10)

Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.

MSTY: 4.7/10YMAG: 4.7/10

Yield-trend comparison unavailable

One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.

MSTY: —YMAG: —

MSTY is cheaper (103.00% vs 134.00%)

On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $3100/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.

On $10,000 invested, MSTY's lower expense ratio saves roughly $31/year in fees versus YMAG. Over 20 years that compounds to a meaningful drag — expense ratios are one of the few costs investors fully control.

MSTY: 103.00%YMAG: 134.00%

MSTY is 2.6× larger by AUM

Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

MSTY: $757MYMAG: $286M

Both have similar tax-treatment concerns

Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.

MSTY: Ordinary incomeYMAG: Ordinary income

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, MSTY or YMAG?

MSTY wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but YMAG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

MSTY vs YMAG: which has a higher dividend yield?

MSTY yields 36.21% and YMAG yields 39.37%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $316 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is MSTY or YMAG a safer dividend in 2026?

MSTY scores 4.7/10 (Weak) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. YMAG scores 4.7/10 (Weak). Both have comparable safety scores.

Which has better dividend growth, MSTY or YMAG?