← All comparisons

Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

LOW vs NKE

Lowe's Companies, Inc. versus Nike, Inc. Class B Common Stock — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

LOW wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NKE can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

LOW or NKE — which is better?

LOW wins this comparison 4–1 across 6 dimensions. LOW yields 2.69% — lower than NKE's 4.37% — and carries a 7.1/10 dividend safety score (Solid) vs 5.6/10 for NKE (Mixed). LOW wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NKE can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

On yield alone, NKE generates 4.37% vs 2.69% — a 1.68% difference that translates to $1,680 more per year on a $100,000 investment. On dividend safety, LOW scores 7.1/10 (Solid) vs 5.6/10 (Mixed) for NKE — investors prioritizing income reliability should weight that gap alongside the yield difference.

Scorecard at a glance

DimensionLOWNKEWinner
Yield2.69%4.37%NKE wins
Dividend safety7.1/105.6/10LOW wins
Growth trend+0.88% vs 5y+2.90% vs 5yLOW wins
Volatility (beta)0.881.10LOW wins
Scale$104.1B$55.2BLOW wins
Tax efficiencyQualified-eligibleQualified-eligibleTie
Overall4 wins1 winsLOW wins

Dimension by dimension

NKE wins on yield (4.37% vs 2.69%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $168 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

NKE's higher yield (4.37%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus LOW's 2.69% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

LOW: 2.69%NKE: 4.37%

LOW wins on safety (7.1/10 vs 5.6/10)

Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. LOW scores better on the weighted average of those factors.

LOW (7.1/10) scores 1.5 points higher than NKE (5.6/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.

LOW: 7.1/10NKE: 5.6/10

LOW shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

LOW's yield is 0.88% above its 5y average, versus 2.90% for NKE. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

LOW: +0.88% vs 5yNKE: +2.90% vs 5y

LOW is less volatile (beta 0.88 vs 1.10)

Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.

LOW: 0.88NKE: 1.10

LOW is 1.9× larger by market cap

Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

LOW: $104.1BNKE: $55.2B

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

Full breakdown per ticker: are LOW dividends qualified and are NKE dividends qualified — each with the after-tax income at every federal bracket.

LOW: Qualified-eligibleNKE: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice. Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

LOW or NKE — which is better?

LOW is better on our scoring, winning 4–1 across six dimensions: yield, dividend safety, growth, cost, scale, and tax treatment. LOW wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NKE can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Which is better for income, LOW or NKE?

LOW wins 4–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but NKE can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

LOW vs NKE: which has a higher dividend yield?

LOW yields 2.69% and NKE yields 4.37%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $168 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is LOW or NKE a safer dividend in 2026?

LOW scores 7.1/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. NKE scores 5.6/10 (Mixed). LOW is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, LOW or NKE?

LOW's yield is 0.88% above its 5y average, versus 2.90% for NKE. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

LOW vs NKE: which is more tax-efficient?

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

Compare both against your actual holdings

Put LOW and NKE into the free analyzer with the rest of your portfolio. You'll see what each one contributes to your annual income, your weighted safety score, and whether adding LOW diversifies you or just duplicates what you hold. No account, no download.