Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
IDV vs QYLD
iShares International Select Dividend ETF versus Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
IDV wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but QYLD can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | IDV | QYLD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 4.63% | 5.77% | QYLD wins |
| Dividend safety | 6.8/10 | 6.8/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 50.00% | 60.00% | IDV wins |
| Scale | $7.9B | $8.4B | Tie |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Ordinary income | IDV wins |
| Overall | 2 wins | 1 wins | IDV wins |
Dimension by dimension
QYLD wins on yield (5.77% vs 4.63%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $114 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Safety scores are too close to call (6.8/10 vs 6.8/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
IDV is cheaper (50.00% vs 60.00%)
On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $1000/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.
Comparable scale ($7.9B vs $8.4B)
Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.
IDV is more tax-efficient in a taxable account
QYLD's distributions are typically taxed as ordinary income (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT) — versus qualified dividends from IDV which get the lower long-term capital gains rate.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, IDV or QYLD?
IDV wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but QYLD can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
IDV vs QYLD: which has a higher dividend yield?
IDV yields 4.63% and QYLD yields 5.77%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $114 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is IDV or QYLD a safer dividend in 2026?
IDV scores 6.8/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. QYLD scores 6.8/10 (Solid). Both have comparable safety scores.
Which has better dividend growth, IDV or QYLD?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
IDV vs QYLD: which is more tax-efficient?
QYLD's distributions are typically taxed as ordinary income (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT) — versus qualified dividends from IDV which get the lower long-term capital gains rate.
Already own IDV or QYLD? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding IDV to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →