← All comparisons

Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

HON vs LMT

Honeywell International Inc. versus Lockheed Martin Corporation — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

LMT wins 2–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but HON can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Scorecard at a glance

DimensionHONLMTWinner
Yield2.05%2.63%LMT wins
Dividend safety7.3/107.3/10Tie
Growth trend+0.04% vs 5y+0.00% vs 5yTie
Volatility (beta)0.810.24LMT wins
Scale$146.8B$118.4BTie
Tax efficiencyQualified-eligibleQualified-eligibleTie
Overall0 wins2 winsLMT wins

Dimension by dimension

LMT wins on yield (2.63% vs 2.05%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $58 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

HON: 2.05%LMT: 2.63%

Safety scores are too close to call (7.3/10 vs 7.3/10)

Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.

HON: 7.3/10LMT: 7.3/10

Yield trends are similar

Both tickers' current yields sit close to their 5-year averages, suggesting comparable dividend-vs-price trajectories.

HON: +0.04% vs 5yLMT: +0.00% vs 5y

LMT is less volatile (beta 0.24 vs 0.81)

Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.

HON: 0.81LMT: 0.24

Comparable scale ($146.8B vs $118.4B)

Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.

HON: $146.8BLMT: $118.4B

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

HON: Qualified-eligibleLMT: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better, HON or LMT?

LMT wins 2–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but HON can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Does HON or LMT have a higher yield?

On a $10,000 investment that's about $58 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is HON or LMT a safer dividend?

HON scores 7.3/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. LMT scores 7.3/10 (Solid). See the safety dimension above for what drove each score.

Should I own both HON and LMT?

It depends on overlap. Two ETFs in similar categories often hold many of the same companies — owning both can mean paying two expense ratios for similar exposure. Check the underlying holdings before stacking.

Already own HON or LMT? See if the other adds anything.

Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding LMT to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).

Check overlap with my portfolio →