Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
GLPI vs O
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. versus Realty Income Corporation — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
O wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but GLPI can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | GLPI | O | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 6.60% | 4.95% | GLPI wins |
| Dividend safety | 4.9/10 | 5.8/10 | O wins |
| Growth trend | +0.59% vs 5y | -0.11% vs 5y | O wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.71 | 0.73 | Tie |
| Scale | $13.4B | $61.1B | O wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 1 wins | 3 wins | O wins |
Dimension by dimension
GLPI wins on yield (6.60% vs 4.95%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $165 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
O wins on safety (5.8/10 vs 4.9/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. O scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
O shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
O's yield is 0.11% below its 5y average, versus 0.59% for GLPI. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
Volatility (beta) is similar
Both tickers move with comparable sensitivity to the broader market.
O is 4.6× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, GLPI or O?
O wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but GLPI can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
GLPI vs O: which has a higher dividend yield?
GLPI yields 6.60% and O yields 4.95%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $165 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is GLPI or O a safer dividend in 2026?
GLPI scores 4.9/10 (Weak) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. O scores 5.8/10 (Mixed). O is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, GLPI or O?
O's yield is 0.11% below its 5y average, versus 0.59% for GLPI. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
GLPI vs O: which is more tax-efficient?
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
Already own GLPI or O? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding O to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →