Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
FDVV vs HDV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF versus iShares Core High Dividend ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
HDV wins 2–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but FDVV can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | FDVV | HDV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 2.69% | 2.90% | HDV wins |
| Dividend safety | 7.3/10 | 7.6/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 15.00% | 8.00% | HDV wins |
| Scale | $9.8B | $13.7B | Tie |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 0 wins | 2 wins | HDV wins |
Dimension by dimension
HDV wins on yield (2.90% vs 2.69%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $21 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
HDV's higher yield (2.90%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus FDVV's 2.69% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
Safety scores are too close to call (7.3/10 vs 7.6/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
HDV is cheaper (8.00% vs 15.00%)
On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $700/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.
On $10,000 invested, HDV's lower expense ratio saves roughly $7/year in fees versus FDVV. Over 20 years that compounds to a meaningful drag — expense ratios are one of the few costs investors fully control.
Comparable scale ($9.8B vs $13.7B)
Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, FDVV or HDV?
HDV wins 2–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but FDVV can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
FDVV vs HDV: which has a higher dividend yield?
FDVV yields 2.69% and HDV yields 2.90%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $21 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is FDVV or HDV a safer dividend in 2026?
FDVV scores 7.3/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. HDV scores 7.6/10 (Solid). HDV is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, FDVV or HDV?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
FDVV vs HDV: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Get emailed when FDVV vs HDV data updates.
Already own FDVV or HDV? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding HDV to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →