Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
EPR vs O
EPR Properties versus Realty Income Corp. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
O wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but EPR can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
EPR or O — which is better?
O wins this comparison 3–2 across 6 dimensions. O yields 5.79% — lower than EPR's 6.25% — and carries a 5.8/10 dividend safety score (Mixed) vs 4.6/10 for EPR (Weak). O wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but EPR can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
On dividend safety, O scores 5.8/10 (Mixed) vs 4.6/10 (Weak) for EPR — O has a stronger composite of payout coverage, yield zone, and dividend trend signals. On yield, EPR's 6.25% vs 5.79% represents a $460 annual income gap on $100,000 invested.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | EPR | O | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 6.25% | 5.79% | EPR wins |
| Dividend safety | 4.6/10 | 5.8/10 | O wins |
| Growth trend | -0.53% vs 5y | +0.73% vs 5y | EPR wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 1.03 | 0.70 | O wins |
| Scale | $4.4B | $54.1B | O wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 3 wins | O wins |
Dimension by dimension
EPR wins on yield (6.25% vs 5.79%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $46 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
EPR's higher yield (6.25%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus O's 5.79% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
O wins on safety (5.8/10 vs 4.6/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. O scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
O (5.8/10) scores 1.2 points higher than EPR (4.6/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
EPR shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
EPR's yield is 0.53% below its 5y average, versus 0.73% for O. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
O is less volatile (beta 0.70 vs 1.03)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
O is 12.3× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
Full breakdown per ticker: are EPR dividends qualified and are O dividends qualified — each with the after-tax income at every federal bracket.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice. Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
EPR or O — which is better?
O is better on our scoring, winning 3–2 across six dimensions: yield, dividend safety, growth, cost, scale, and tax treatment. O wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but EPR can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Which is better for income, EPR or O?
O wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but EPR can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
EPR vs O: which has a higher dividend yield?
EPR yields 6.25% and O yields 5.79%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $46 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is EPR or O a safer dividend in 2026?
EPR scores 4.6/10 (Weak) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. O scores 5.8/10 (Mixed). O is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, EPR or O?
EPR's yield is 0.53% below its 5y average, versus 0.73% for O. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
EPR vs O: which is more tax-efficient?
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
Get emailed when EPR vs O data updates.
Compare both against your actual holdings
Put EPR and O into the free analyzer with the rest of your portfolio. You'll see what each one contributes to your annual income, your weighted safety score, and whether adding O diversifies you or just duplicates what you hold. No account, no download.