Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
EPR vs NLY
EPR Properties versus Annaly Capital Management, Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
NLY wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but EPR can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | EPR | NLY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 6.25% | 12.92% | NLY wins |
| Dividend safety | 4.6/10 | 4.2/10 | EPR wins |
| Growth trend | -0.53% vs 5y | -0.72% vs 5y | NLY wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 1.03 | 1.27 | EPR wins |
| Scale | $4.4B | $15.9B | NLY wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 3 wins | NLY wins |
Dimension by dimension
NLY wins on yield (12.92% vs 6.25%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $667 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
NLY's higher yield (12.92%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus EPR's 6.25% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
EPR wins on safety (4.6/10 vs 4.2/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. EPR scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
NLY shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
NLY's yield is 0.72% below its 5y average, versus 0.53% for EPR. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
EPR is less volatile (beta 1.03 vs 1.27)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
NLY is 3.6× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, EPR or NLY?
NLY wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but EPR can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
EPR vs NLY: which has a higher dividend yield?
EPR yields 6.25% and NLY yields 12.92%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $667 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is EPR or NLY a safer dividend in 2026?
EPR scores 4.6/10 (Weak) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. NLY scores 4.2/10 (Weak). EPR is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, EPR or NLY?
NLY's yield is 0.72% below its 5y average, versus 0.53% for EPR. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
EPR vs NLY: which is more tax-efficient?
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
Get emailed when EPR vs NLY data updates.
Already own EPR or NLY? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding NLY to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →