Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

EPD vs ET

Enterprise Products Partners L.P. versus Energy Transfer L.P. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

EPD wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but ET can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	EPD	ET	Winner
Yield	5.70%	6.81%	ET wins
Dividend safety	7.3/10	4.8/10	EPD wins
Growth trend	-1.46% vs 5y	-0.55% vs 5y	EPD wins
Volatility (beta)	0.49	0.57	Tie
Scale	$83.1B	$67.4B	Tie
Tax efficiency	Qualified-eligible	Qualified-eligible	Tie
Overall	2 wins	1 wins	EPD wins

Dimension by dimension

ET wins on yield (6.81% vs 5.70%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $111 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

ET's higher yield (6.81%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus EPD's 5.70% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

EPD: 5.70%ET: 6.81%

EPD wins on safety (7.3/10 vs 4.8/10)

Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. EPD scores better on the weighted average of those factors.

EPD (7.3/10) scores 2.5 points higher than ET (4.8/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.

EPD: 7.3/10ET: 4.8/10

EPD shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

EPD's yield is 1.46% below its 5y average, versus 0.55% for ET. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

EPD: -1.46% vs 5yET: -0.55% vs 5y

Volatility (beta) is similar

Both tickers move with comparable sensitivity to the broader market.

EPD: 0.49ET: 0.57

Comparable scale ($83.1B vs $67.4B)

Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.

EPD: $83.1BET: $67.4B

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

EPD: Qualified-eligibleET: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, EPD or ET?

EPD wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but ET can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

EPD vs ET: which has a higher dividend yield?

EPD yields 5.70% and ET yields 6.81%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $111 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is EPD or ET a safer dividend in 2026?

EPD scores 7.3/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. ET scores 4.8/10 (Weak). EPD is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, EPD or ET?