Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

ENB vs EPD

Enbridge Inc versus Enterprise Products Partners L.P. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

EPD wins 3–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but ENB can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	ENB	EPD	Winner
Yield	4.95%	5.70%	EPD wins
Dividend safety	6.3/10	7.3/10	EPD wins
Growth trend	-1.55% vs 5y	-1.46% vs 5y	Tie
Volatility (beta)	0.79	0.49	EPD wins
Scale	$124.5B	$83.1B	Tie
Tax efficiency	Qualified-eligible	Qualified-eligible	Tie
Overall	0 wins	3 wins	EPD wins

Dimension by dimension

EPD wins on yield (5.70% vs 4.95%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $75 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

EPD's higher yield (5.70%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus ENB's 4.95% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

ENB: 4.95%EPD: 5.70%

EPD wins on safety (7.3/10 vs 6.3/10)

Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. EPD scores better on the weighted average of those factors.

EPD (7.3/10) scores 1.0 points higher than ENB (6.3/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.

ENB: 6.3/10EPD: 7.3/10

Yield trends are similar

Both tickers' current yields sit close to their 5-year averages, suggesting comparable dividend-vs-price trajectories.

ENB: -1.55% vs 5yEPD: -1.46% vs 5y

EPD is less volatile (beta 0.49 vs 0.79)

Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.

ENB: 0.79EPD: 0.49

Comparable scale ($124.5B vs $83.1B)

Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.

ENB: $124.5BEPD: $83.1B

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

ENB: Qualified-eligibleEPD: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, ENB or EPD?

EPD wins 3–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but ENB can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

ENB vs EPD: which has a higher dividend yield?

ENB yields 4.95% and EPD yields 5.70%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $75 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is ENB or EPD a safer dividend in 2026?

ENB scores 6.3/10 (Mixed) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. EPD scores 7.3/10 (Solid). EPD is the safer pick on our scoring model.

Which has better dividend growth, ENB or EPD?