Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
DIVO vs FDVV
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF versus Fidelity High Dividend ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
FDVV wins 3–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but DIVO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | DIVO | FDVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 2.26% | 2.69% | FDVV wins |
| Dividend safety | 7.3/10 | 7.3/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 56.00% | 15.00% | FDVV wins |
| Scale | $7.2B | $9.8B | Tie |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Qualified-eligible | FDVV wins |
| Overall | 0 wins | 3 wins | FDVV wins |
Dimension by dimension
FDVV wins on yield (2.69% vs 2.26%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $43 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
FDVV's higher yield (2.69%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus DIVO's 2.26% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
Safety scores are too close to call (7.3/10 vs 7.3/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
FDVV is cheaper (15.00% vs 56.00%)
On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $4100/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.
On $10,000 invested, FDVV's lower expense ratio saves roughly $41/year in fees versus DIVO. Over 20 years that compounds to a meaningful drag — expense ratios are one of the few costs investors fully control.
Comparable scale ($7.2B vs $9.8B)
Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.
FDVV is more tax-efficient in a taxable account
DIVO's distributions are typically taxed as ordinary income (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT) — versus qualified dividends from FDVV which get the lower long-term capital gains rate.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, DIVO or FDVV?
FDVV wins 3–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but DIVO can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
DIVO vs FDVV: which has a higher dividend yield?
DIVO yields 2.26% and FDVV yields 2.69%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $43 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is DIVO or FDVV a safer dividend in 2026?
DIVO scores 7.3/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. FDVV scores 7.3/10 (Solid). Both have comparable safety scores.
Which has better dividend growth, DIVO or FDVV?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
DIVO vs FDVV: which is more tax-efficient?
DIVO's distributions are typically taxed as ordinary income (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT) — versus qualified dividends from FDVV which get the lower long-term capital gains rate.
Get emailed when DIVO vs FDVV data updates.
Already own DIVO or FDVV? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding FDVV to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →