Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
DHR vs JNJ
Danaher Corporation versus Johnson & Johnson — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
JNJ wins 5–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but DHR can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | DHR | JNJ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 0.88% | 2.10% | JNJ wins |
| Dividend safety | 6.9/10 | 8.0/10 | JNJ wins |
| Growth trend | +0.46% vs 5y | -0.67% vs 5y | JNJ wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.96 | 0.23 | JNJ wins |
| Scale | $130.1B | $624.1B | JNJ wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 0 wins | 5 wins | JNJ wins |
Dimension by dimension
JNJ wins on yield (2.10% vs 0.88%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $122 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
JNJ wins on safety (8.0/10 vs 6.9/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. JNJ scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
JNJ shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
JNJ's yield is 0.67% below its 5y average, versus 0.46% for DHR. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
JNJ is less volatile (beta 0.23 vs 0.96)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
JNJ is 4.8× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, DHR or JNJ?
JNJ wins 5–0 on our six-dimension comparison, but DHR can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
DHR vs JNJ: which has a higher dividend yield?
DHR yields 0.88% and JNJ yields 2.10%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $122 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is DHR or JNJ a safer dividend in 2026?
DHR scores 6.9/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. JNJ scores 8.0/10 (Strong). JNJ is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, DHR or JNJ?
JNJ's yield is 0.67% below its 5y average, versus 0.46% for DHR. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
DHR vs JNJ: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Already own DHR or JNJ? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding JNJ to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →