← All comparisons

Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

JNJ vs PFE

Johnson & Johnson versus Pfizer Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

JNJ wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but PFE can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Scorecard at a glance

DimensionJNJPFEWinner
Yield2.21%6.61%PFE wins
Dividend safety7.2/104.3/10JNJ wins
Growth trend+1.56% vs 5yTie
Volatility (beta)0.260.29Tie
Scale$563.8B$147.7BJNJ wins
Tax efficiencyQualified-eligibleQualified-eligibleTie
Overall2 wins1 winsJNJ wins

Dimension by dimension

PFE wins on yield (6.61% vs 2.21%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $440 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

JNJ: 2.21%PFE: 6.61%

JNJ wins on safety (7.2/10 vs 4.3/10)

Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. JNJ scores better on the weighted average of those factors.

JNJ: 7.2/10PFE: 4.3/10

Yield-trend comparison unavailable

One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.

JNJ: PFE: +1.56% vs 5y

Volatility (beta) is similar

Both tickers move with comparable sensitivity to the broader market.

JNJ: 0.26PFE: 0.29

JNJ is 3.8× larger by market cap

Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

JNJ: $563.8BPFE: $147.7B

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

JNJ: Qualified-eligiblePFE: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better, JNJ or PFE?

JNJ wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but PFE can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Does JNJ or PFE have a higher yield?

On a $10,000 investment that's about $440 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is JNJ or PFE a safer dividend?

JNJ scores 7.2/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. PFE scores 4.3/10 (Weak). See the safety dimension above for what drove each score.

Should I own both JNJ and PFE?

It depends on overlap. Two ETFs in similar categories often hold many of the same companies — owning both can mean paying two expense ratios for similar exposure. Check the underlying holdings before stacking.

Already own JNJ or PFE? See if the other adds anything.

Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding JNJ to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).

Check overlap with my portfolio →