Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
DGRW vs VTI
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund versus VANGUARD TOTAL STOCK MKT ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
VTI wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but DGRW can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | DGRW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 1.34% | 1.05% | DGRW wins |
| Dividend safety | 6.9/10 | 7.4/10 | VTI wins |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 28.00% | 3.00% | VTI wins |
| Scale | $16.2B | $2.3T | VTI wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 1 wins | 3 wins | VTI wins |
Dimension by dimension
DGRW wins on yield (1.34% vs 1.05%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $29 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
VTI wins on safety (7.4/10 vs 6.9/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. VTI scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
VTI is cheaper (3.00% vs 28.00%)
On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $2500/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.
VTI is 141.5× larger by AUM
Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, DGRW or VTI?
VTI wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but DGRW can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
DGRW vs VTI: which has a higher dividend yield?
DGRW yields 1.34% and VTI yields 1.05%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $29 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is DGRW or VTI a safer dividend in 2026?
DGRW scores 6.9/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. VTI scores 7.4/10 (Solid). VTI is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, DGRW or VTI?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
DGRW vs VTI: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Already own DGRW or VTI? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding VTI to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →