Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
AMT vs STAG
American Tower Corporation versus STAG Industrial, Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
AMT and STAG are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
Neither AMT nor STAG wins outright — the two are nearly equivalent across all 6 dimensions, making the choice largely a matter of which account you hold them in and personal preference on yield vs stability. AMT and STAG are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
On dividend safety, AMT scores 6.8/10 (Solid) vs 5.2/10 (Mixed) for STAG — AMT has a stronger composite of payout coverage, yield zone, and dividend trend signals. On yield, STAG's 4.11% vs 3.77% represents a $340 annual income gap on $100,000 invested.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | AMT | STAG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 3.77% | 4.11% | STAG wins |
| Dividend safety | 6.8/10 | 5.2/10 | AMT wins |
| Growth trend | +0.88% vs 5y | +0.07% vs 5y | STAG wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.90 | 0.96 | Tie |
| Scale | $86.2B | $7.4B | AMT wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 2 wins | Tie |
Dimension by dimension
STAG wins on yield (4.11% vs 3.77%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $34 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
STAG's higher yield (4.11%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus AMT's 3.77% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
AMT wins on safety (6.8/10 vs 5.2/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. AMT scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
AMT (6.8/10) scores 1.6 points higher than STAG (5.2/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
STAG shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
STAG's yield is 0.07% above its 5y average, versus 0.88% for AMT. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
Volatility (beta) is similar
Both tickers move with comparable sensitivity to the broader market.
AMT is 11.6× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, AMT or STAG?
AMT and STAG are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
AMT vs STAG: which has a higher dividend yield?
AMT yields 3.77% and STAG yields 4.11%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $34 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is AMT or STAG a safer dividend in 2026?
AMT scores 6.8/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. STAG scores 5.2/10 (Mixed). AMT is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, AMT or STAG?
STAG's yield is 0.07% above its 5y average, versus 0.88% for AMT. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
AMT vs STAG: which is more tax-efficient?
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
Get emailed when AMT vs STAG data updates.
Already own AMT or STAG? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding either to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →