Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
AMT vs STAG
American Tower Corporation versus STAG Industrial, Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
AMT wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but STAG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | AMT | STAG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 3.77% | 3.81% | Tie |
| Dividend safety | 6.8/10 | 5.7/10 | AMT wins |
| Growth trend | +0.88% vs 5y | -0.22% vs 5y | STAG wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.90 | 0.98 | Tie |
| Scale | $86.2B | $7.7B | AMT wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 1 wins | AMT wins |
Dimension by dimension
AMT and STAG have nearly identical yields (3.77% vs 3.81%)
Yields are within 5 basis points — effectively a coin-flip on income.
AMT wins on safety (6.8/10 vs 5.7/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. AMT scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
STAG shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
STAG's yield is 0.22% below its 5y average, versus 0.88% for AMT. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
Volatility (beta) is similar
Both tickers move with comparable sensitivity to the broader market.
AMT is 11.3× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, AMT or STAG?
AMT wins 2–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but STAG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
AMT vs STAG: which has a higher dividend yield?
AMT yields 3.77% and STAG yields 3.81%. Yields are within 5 basis points — effectively a coin-flip on income.
Is AMT or STAG a safer dividend in 2026?
AMT scores 6.8/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. STAG scores 5.7/10 (Mixed). AMT is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, AMT or STAG?
STAG's yield is 0.22% below its 5y average, versus 0.88% for AMT. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
AMT vs STAG: which is more tax-efficient?
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
Already own AMT or STAG? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding AMT to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →