Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
ADC vs PLD
Agree Realty Corporation versus Prologis Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
ADC wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but PLD can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | ADC | PLD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 3.98% | 2.91% | ADC wins |
| Dividend safety | 5.7/10 | 6.7/10 | PLD wins |
| Growth trend | -0.23% vs 5y | +0.16% vs 5y | ADC wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.47 | 1.34 | ADC wins |
| Scale | $9.8B | $140.4B | PLD wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 3 wins | 2 wins | ADC wins |
Dimension by dimension
ADC wins on yield (3.98% vs 2.91%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $107 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
PLD wins on safety (6.7/10 vs 5.7/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. PLD scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
ADC shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
ADC's yield is 0.23% below its 5y average, versus 0.16% for PLD. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ADC is less volatile (beta 0.47 vs 1.34)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
PLD is 14.4× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, ADC or PLD?
ADC wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but PLD can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
ADC vs PLD: which has a higher dividend yield?
ADC yields 3.98% and PLD yields 2.91%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $107 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is ADC or PLD a safer dividend in 2026?
ADC scores 5.7/10 (Mixed) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. PLD scores 6.7/10 (Solid). PLD is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, ADC or PLD?
ADC's yield is 0.23% below its 5y average, versus 0.16% for PLD. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ADC vs PLD: which is more tax-efficient?
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
Already own ADC or PLD? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding ADC to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →