Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
ADC vs GLPI
Agree Realty Corporation versus Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
ADC and GLPI are evenly matched (1–1 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | ADC | GLPI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 4.12% | 6.60% | GLPI wins |
| Dividend safety | 5.2/10 | 4.9/10 | Tie |
| Growth trend | -0.09% vs 5y | +0.59% vs 5y | ADC wins |
| Volatility (beta) | — | — | Tie |
| Scale | $9.4B | $13.4B | Tie |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 1 wins | 1 wins | Tie |
Dimension by dimension
GLPI wins on yield (6.60% vs 4.12%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $248 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
GLPI's higher yield (6.60%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus ADC's 4.12% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
Safety scores are too close to call (5.2/10 vs 4.9/10)
Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.
ADC shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
ADC's yield is 0.09% below its 5y average, versus 0.59% for GLPI. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
Volatility comparison unavailable
Beta data missing for one or both tickers.
Comparable scale ($9.4B vs $13.4B)
Within 1.5x of each other on market cap / AUM — similar institutional footprint.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, ADC or GLPI?
ADC and GLPI are evenly matched (1–1 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.
ADC vs GLPI: which has a higher dividend yield?
ADC yields 4.12% and GLPI yields 6.60%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $248 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is ADC or GLPI a safer dividend in 2026?
ADC scores 5.2/10 (Mixed) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. GLPI scores 4.9/10 (Weak). ADC is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, ADC or GLPI?
ADC's yield is 0.09% below its 5y average, versus 0.59% for GLPI. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ADC vs GLPI: which is more tax-efficient?
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
Get emailed when ADC vs GLPI data updates.
Already own ADC or GLPI? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding either to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →