Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
ADC vs EPR
Agree Realty Corporation versus EPR Properties — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
ADC wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but EPR can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | ADC | EPR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 4.29% | 6.25% | EPR wins |
| Dividend safety | 5.2/10 | 4.6/10 | ADC wins |
| Growth trend | +0.08% vs 5y | -0.53% vs 5y | EPR wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.48 | 1.03 | ADC wins |
| Scale | $8.9B | $4.4B | ADC wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 3 wins | 2 wins | ADC wins |
Dimension by dimension
EPR wins on yield (6.25% vs 4.29%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $196 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
ADC wins on safety (5.2/10 vs 4.6/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. ADC scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
EPR shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
EPR's yield is 0.53% below its 5y average, versus 0.08% for ADC. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ADC is less volatile (beta 0.48 vs 1.03)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
ADC is 2.0× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better, ADC or EPR?
ADC wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but EPR can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Does ADC or EPR have a higher yield?
On a $10,000 investment that's about $196 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is ADC or EPR a safer dividend?
ADC scores 5.2/10 (Mixed) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. EPR scores 4.6/10 (Weak). See the safety dimension above for what drove each score.
Should I own both ADC and EPR?
It depends on overlap. Two ETFs in similar categories often hold many of the same companies — owning both can mean paying two expense ratios for similar exposure. Check the underlying holdings before stacking.
Already own ADC or EPR? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding ADC to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →