Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
ADC vs AMT
Agree Realty Corporation versus American Tower Corporation — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
ADC wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but AMT can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
ADC wins this comparison 3–2 across 6 dimensions. ADC yields 4.38% — higher than AMT's 3.77% — and carries a 5.2/10 dividend safety score (Mixed) vs 6.8/10 for AMT (Solid). ADC wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but AMT can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
On dividend safety, AMT scores 6.8/10 (Solid) vs 5.2/10 (Mixed) for ADC — AMT has a stronger composite of payout coverage, yield zone, and dividend trend signals. On yield, ADC's 4.38% vs 3.77% represents a $610 annual income gap on $100,000 invested.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | ADC | AMT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 4.38% | 3.77% | ADC wins |
| Dividend safety | 5.2/10 | 6.8/10 | AMT wins |
| Growth trend | +0.17% vs 5y | +0.88% vs 5y | ADC wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 0.47 | 0.90 | ADC wins |
| Scale | $9.1B | $86.2B | AMT wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 3 wins | 2 wins | ADC wins |
Dimension by dimension
ADC wins on yield (4.38% vs 3.77%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $61 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
ADC's higher yield (4.38%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus AMT's 3.77% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.
AMT wins on safety (6.8/10 vs 5.2/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. AMT scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
AMT (6.8/10) scores 1.6 points higher than ADC (5.2/10). A higher safety score means lower historical indicators of dividend cut risk — payout ratio, yield zone, and trend all factor in.
ADC shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
ADC's yield is 0.17% above its 5y average, versus 0.88% for AMT. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ADC is less volatile (beta 0.47 vs 0.90)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
AMT is 9.4× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, ADC or AMT?
ADC wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but AMT can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
ADC vs AMT: which has a higher dividend yield?
ADC yields 4.38% and AMT yields 3.77%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $61 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is ADC or AMT a safer dividend in 2026?
ADC scores 5.2/10 (Mixed) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. AMT scores 6.8/10 (Solid). AMT is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, ADC or AMT?
ADC's yield is 0.17% above its 5y average, versus 0.88% for AMT. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ADC vs AMT: which is more tax-efficient?
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
Get emailed when ADC vs AMT data updates.
Already own ADC or AMT? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding ADC to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →