Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

AAPL vs AVGO

Apple Inc versus Broadcom Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

AAPL and AVGO are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.

Neither AAPL nor AVGO wins outright — the two are nearly equivalent across all 6 dimensions, making the choice largely a matter of which account you hold them in and personal preference on yield vs stability. AAPL and AVGO are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.

On yield alone, AVGO generates 0.71% vs 0.34% — a 0.37% difference that translates to $370 more per year on a $100,000 investment.

Scorecard at a glance

Dimension	AAPL	AVGO	Winner
Yield	0.34%	0.71%	AVGO wins
Dividend safety	8.8/10	8.8/10	Tie
Growth trend	-0.16% vs 5y	-1.05% vs 5y	AVGO wins
Volatility (beta)	1.08	1.46	AAPL wins
Scale	$4.8T	$1.7T	AAPL wins
Tax efficiency	Qualified-eligible	Qualified-eligible	Tie
Overall	2 wins	2 wins	Tie

Dimension by dimension

AVGO wins on yield (0.71% vs 0.34%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $37 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

AVGO's higher yield (0.71%) looks attractive but investors should weigh whether the extra income compensates for any additional risk versus AAPL's 0.34% — especially if the higher yield is driven by covered calls or a falling share price.

AAPL: 0.34%AVGO: 0.71%

Safety scores are too close to call (8.8/10 vs 8.8/10)

Both score within 0.3 points on our 0-10 dividend safety scale — comparable risk profiles on the signals we measure.

AAPL: 8.8/10AVGO: 8.8/10

AVGO shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

AVGO's yield is 1.05% below its 5y average, versus 0.16% for AAPL. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

AAPL: -0.16% vs 5yAVGO: -1.05% vs 5y

AAPL is less volatile (beta 1.08 vs 1.46)

Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.

AAPL: 1.08AVGO: 1.46

AAPL is 2.8× larger by market cap

Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

AAPL: $4.8TAVGO: $1.7T

Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions

Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.

AAPL: Qualified-eligibleAVGO: Qualified-eligible

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better for income, AAPL or AVGO?

AAPL and AVGO are evenly matched (2–2 across six dimensions) — the right pick comes down to which dimension you weight most.

AAPL vs AVGO: which has a higher dividend yield?

AAPL yields 0.34% and AVGO yields 0.71%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $37 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is AAPL or AVGO a safer dividend in 2026?

AAPL scores 8.8/10 (Strong) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. AVGO scores 8.8/10 (Strong). Both have comparable safety scores.

Which has better dividend growth, AAPL or AVGO?