Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
TSLY vs XYLD
YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF versus Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
XYLD wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but TSLY can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | TSLY | XYLD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 28.79% | 10.61% | TSLY wins |
| Dividend safety | 4.7/10 | 5.1/10 | XYLD wins |
| Growth trend | — | — | Tie |
| Expense ratio | 107.00% | 60.00% | XYLD wins |
| Scale | $900M | $3.1B | XYLD wins |
| Tax efficiency | Ordinary income | Ordinary income | Tie |
| Overall | 1 wins | 3 wins | XYLD wins |
Dimension by dimension
TSLY wins on yield (28.79% vs 10.61%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $1818 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
XYLD wins on safety (5.1/10 vs 4.7/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. XYLD scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
Yield-trend comparison unavailable
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
XYLD is cheaper (60.00% vs 107.00%)
On a $10,000 position the lower expense ratio saves about $4700/year — small annually but compounds significantly over 20+ years.
XYLD is 3.5× larger by AUM
Larger funds tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both have similar tax-treatment concerns
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, TSLY or XYLD?
XYLD wins 3–1 on our six-dimension comparison, but TSLY can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
TSLY vs XYLD: which has a higher dividend yield?
TSLY yields 28.79% and XYLD yields 10.61%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $1818 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is TSLY or XYLD a safer dividend in 2026?
TSLY scores 4.7/10 (Weak) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. XYLD scores 5.1/10 (Mixed). XYLD is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, TSLY or XYLD?
One or both tickers are missing 5-year average yield data.
TSLY vs XYLD: which is more tax-efficient?
Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.
Already own TSLY or XYLD? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding XYLD to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →