← All comparisons

Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions

SPG vs WPC

Simon Property Group, Inc. versus W. P. Carey Inc. — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.

WPC wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but SPG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Scorecard at a glance

DimensionSPGWPCWinner
Yield4.64%5.14%WPC wins
Dividend safety6.8/105.5/10SPG wins
Growth trend-0.47% vs 5y-0.67% vs 5yWPC wins
Volatility (beta)1.400.79WPC wins
Scale$61.1B$15.9BSPG wins
Tax efficiencyOrdinary incomeOrdinary incomeTie
Overall2 wins3 winsWPC wins

Dimension by dimension

WPC wins on yield (5.14% vs 4.64%)

On a $10,000 investment that's about $50 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

SPG: 4.64%WPC: 5.14%

SPG wins on safety (6.8/10 vs 5.5/10)

Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. SPG scores better on the weighted average of those factors.

SPG: 6.8/10WPC: 5.5/10

WPC shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend

WPC's yield is 0.67% below its 5y average, versus 0.47% for SPG. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.

SPG: -0.47% vs 5yWPC: -0.67% vs 5y

WPC is less volatile (beta 0.79 vs 1.40)

Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.

SPG: 1.40WPC: 0.79

SPG is 3.8× larger by market cap

Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.

SPG: $61.1BWPC: $15.9B

Both have similar tax-treatment concerns

Both pay primarily ordinary-income distributions (covered call ETF, REIT, or mREIT). Hold in a tax-advantaged account for the cleanest treatment.

SPG: Ordinary incomeWPC: Ordinary income

How we compare these

Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.

This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.

Frequently asked

Which is better, SPG or WPC?

WPC wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but SPG can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.

Does SPG or WPC have a higher yield?

On a $10,000 investment that's about $50 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.

Is SPG or WPC a safer dividend?

SPG scores 6.8/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. WPC scores 5.5/10 (Mixed). See the safety dimension above for what drove each score.

Should I own both SPG and WPC?

It depends on overlap. Two ETFs in similar categories often hold many of the same companies — owning both can mean paying two expense ratios for similar exposure. Check the underlying holdings before stacking.

Already own SPG or WPC? See if the other adds anything.

Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding WPC to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).

Check overlap with my portfolio →