Computed head-to-head · 6 dimensions
ROK vs UPS
Rockwell Automation, Inc. versus United Parcel Service, Inc. - Ordinary Shares - Class B — yield, safety, growth trend, cost, scale, and tax treatment.
UPS wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but ROK can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
Scorecard at a glance
| Dimension | ROK | UPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | 1.38% | 6.06% | UPS wins |
| Dividend safety | 6.8/10 | 4.0/10 | ROK wins |
| Growth trend | -0.26% vs 5y | +1.86% vs 5y | ROK wins |
| Volatility (beta) | 1.54 | 1.10 | UPS wins |
| Scale | $45.0B | $92.0B | UPS wins |
| Tax efficiency | Qualified-eligible | Qualified-eligible | Tie |
| Overall | 2 wins | 3 wins | UPS wins |
Dimension by dimension
UPS wins on yield (6.06% vs 1.38%)
On a $10,000 investment that's about $468 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
ROK wins on safety (6.8/10 vs 4.0/10)
Our score combines yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size. ROK scores better on the weighted average of those factors.
ROK shows healthier dividend-vs-price trend
ROK's yield is 0.26% below its 5y average, versus 1.86% for UPS. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
UPS is less volatile (beta 1.10 vs 1.54)
Lower beta means smaller swings vs the S&P 500 — generally a steadier hold for income investors.
UPS is 2.0× larger by market cap
Larger companies tend to have tighter spreads, deeper liquidity, and lower closure risk.
Both pay qualified-dividend-eligible distributions
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
How we compare these
Every comparison on this page is computed from current public data, not written by hand. Yield comes from the most recent dividend distribution annualized over current price. Safety scores combine yield zone, payout ratio, trend vs 5-year average, instrument type, and size — see our methodology for the exact formula. Tax-efficiency flags identify covered-call ETFs, REITs, and mREITs which distribute primarily as ordinary income.
This is educational, not investment advice.Scores reflect a snapshot of public data on the "as of" dates shown on each ticker's safety page. Verify on the issuer's investor relations page or your brokerage before making decisions.
Frequently asked
Which is better for income, ROK or UPS?
UPS wins 3–2 on our six-dimension comparison, but ROK can still be the better fit depending on your priorities — see each dimension below.
ROK vs UPS: which has a higher dividend yield?
ROK yields 1.38% and UPS yields 6.06%. On a $10,000 investment that's about $468 more in annual dividend income before taxes — though higher yield often comes with higher risk.
Is ROK or UPS a safer dividend in 2026?
ROK scores 6.8/10 (Solid) on the Infnits dividend safety scale. UPS scores 4.0/10 (Weak). ROK is the safer pick on our scoring model.
Which has better dividend growth, ROK or UPS?
ROK's yield is 0.26% below its 5y average, versus 1.86% for UPS. Lower (or below-average) yield trend often means price appreciation outpaced distributions — a healthier signal.
ROK vs UPS: which is more tax-efficient?
Neither is structurally flagged for ordinary-income tax treatment. Most distributions should qualify for the lower long-term capital gains rate if holding-period requirements are met.
Already own ROK or UPS? See if the other adds anything.
Connect your brokerage and Infnits checks whether adding UPS to your existing portfolio actually diversifies — or just duplicates exposure (ETF look-through included).
Check overlap with my portfolio →